Comments on: Cross-browser XForms http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/ News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com. Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:58:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: claud108 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-229931 claud108 Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:24:42 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-229931 Hi, What if I want to whow a case with more data to select in case when user/password is correct? It is needed a choice of the above mentioned case based upon a message of confirmation sent by server. Thank you Hi,
What if I want to whow a case with more data to select in case when user/password is correct?
It is needed a choice of the above mentioned case based upon a message of confirmation sent by server.

Thank you

]]>
By: FormFaces http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-13461 FormFaces Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:43:48 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-13461 FormFaces is a pure JavaScript solution that utilizes AJAX techniques and can be seamlessly integrated with AJAX applications. This means that XForms+HTML can be sent directly to the browser where JavaScript transcodes the XForms controls to HTML form controls and processes the binding directly within the browser - requiring ZERO server-side processing and ZERO plug-ins. This is extremely simple to use, just insert the following tag into your XForms+HTML document: The FormFacesTM JavaScript is compatible with browsers that implement XHTML 1.0, ECMA-262 3rd Edition, and DOM Level 2 which includes Internet Explorer, Netscape, Mozilla, FireFox, Opera, Konquerer, Safari, and NetFront. To this end, the new FormFacesTM framework enables: 1. Cross-browser support - existing client-side browser can be used. 2. Server-side technology agnostic - the same forms can be used across disparate frameworks such as Java and .Net. 3. Offline mode is possible - user interaction does not require server round-trips. FormFaces is available for download, and is licensed under both a GPL and commercial license. FormFaces is a pure JavaScript solution that utilizes AJAX techniques and can be seamlessly integrated with AJAX applications. This means that XForms+HTML can be sent directly to the browser where JavaScript transcodes the XForms controls to HTML form controls and processes the binding directly within the browser - requiring ZERO server-side processing and ZERO plug-ins. This is extremely simple to use, just insert the following tag into your XForms+HTML document:

The FormFacesTM JavaScript is compatible with browsers that implement XHTML 1.0, ECMA-262 3rd Edition, and DOM Level 2 which includes Internet Explorer, Netscape, Mozilla, FireFox, Opera, Konquerer, Safari, and NetFront. To this end, the new FormFacesTM framework enables:

1. Cross-browser support - existing client-side browser can be used.

2. Server-side technology agnostic - the same forms can be used across disparate frameworks such as Java and .Net.

3. Offline mode is possible - user interaction does not require server round-trips.

FormFaces is available for download, and is licensed under both a GPL and commercial license.

]]>
By: Duane Gran http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-13460 Duane Gran Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:26:26 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-13460 I concur with Erik Bruchez on his comments. I've been developing an XForms application with OPS for the past two months and in my particular case server-side processing was the best solution. I think FormsPlayer and Mozilla XForms are excellent solutions, but I would recommend that anyone interested in this technology also consider OPS (as well as Chiba). There is some debate in this thread about the utility of XForms. Naturally for simple cases it is overkill, but if you have ever tried to create an XML document with a web interface (using html forms) you will immediately see the benefits. Throw in a few repeatable elements and the problem becomes nearly intractable -- XForms to the rescue! I concur with Erik Bruchez on his comments. I’ve been developing an XForms application with OPS for the past two months and in my particular case server-side processing was the best solution. I think FormsPlayer and Mozilla XForms are excellent solutions, but I would recommend that anyone interested in this technology also consider OPS (as well as Chiba).

There is some debate in this thread about the utility of XForms. Naturally for simple cases it is overkill, but if you have ever tried to create an XML document with a web interface (using html forms) you will immediately see the benefits. Throw in a few repeatable elements and the problem becomes nearly intractable — XForms to the rescue!

]]>
By: SitePoint Blogs » Mozilla XForms presentation from OSDC http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-11931 SitePoint Blogs » Mozilla XForms presentation from OSDC Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:57:21 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-11931 [...] Last week, I had the pleasure of speaking at the Open Source Developer Conference about Mozilla XForms. Long-time readers of the Tech Times and this blog will remember my coverage of the original spec, my analysis of why XForms adoption was moving so slowly, and more recently my look at how to write cross-browser XForms. The talk was the next stage in my exploration of XForms, pushing the limits of what can be done with the latest preview of the Mozilla extension. [...] […] Last week, I had the pleasure of speaking at the Open Source Developer Conference about Mozilla XForms. Long-time readers of the Tech Times and this blog will remember my coverage of the original spec, my analysis of why XForms adoption was moving so slowly, and more recently my look at how to write cross-browser XForms. The talk was the next stage in my exploration of XForms, pushing the limits of what can be done with the latest preview of the Mozilla extension. […]

]]>
By: SitePoint Blogs » Mozilla XForms Project threatened by cutbacks http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10757 SitePoint Blogs » Mozilla XForms Project threatened by cutbacks Mon, 14 Nov 2005 03:09:48 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10757 [...] A couple of weeks ago, I took the second preview release of the Mozilla XForms Project for a spin, demonstrating how it could be used along with the FormsPlayer plug-in for Internet Explorer to create cross-browser XForms. [...] […] A couple of weeks ago, I took the second preview release of the Mozilla XForms Project for a spin, demonstrating how it could be used along with the FormsPlayer plug-in for Internet Explorer to create cross-browser XForms. […]

]]>
By: Client-Side http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10364 Client-Side Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:58:17 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10364 No Client-Side Support, so why bother. Check out X-FORMS.com XSLT implementation of alot of the XForm Spec. With almost all browsers supporting Client-Side Transformation, it may be interesting to developers. No Client-Side Support, so why bother. Check out X-FORMS.com XSLT implementation of alot of the XForm Spec. With almost all browsers supporting Client-Side Transformation, it may be interesting to developers.

]]>
By: Anonymous http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10357 Anonymous Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:22:36 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10357 Good introduction to this technology but I cant help but wonder whats wrong with how we code html forms now? Seems to work pretty well to me. When I first saw the article I thought it would allow greater control over the styling of form elements, that would get more interest from me. Mark Good introduction to this technology but I cant help but wonder whats wrong with how we code html forms now? Seems to work pretty well to me. When I first saw the article I thought it would allow greater control over the styling of form elements, that would get more interest from me.

Mark

]]>
By: RaS! http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10317 RaS! Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:30:07 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10317 Bah, too tricky... Bah, too tricky…

]]>
By: Erik Bruchez http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10311 Erik Bruchez Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:20:06 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10311 Well again, Dean, the current integration problem is well understood, but keep looking at XForms solution which do not involve upgrading your browser or installing a plugin. Well again, Dean, the current integration problem is well understood, but keep looking at XForms solution which do not involve upgrading your browser or installing a plugin.

]]>
By: Dean C http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10287 Dean C Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:08:14 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/10/27/cross-browser-xforms/#comment-10287 It's as simple as this. I don't want my IE users to have to install a plugin each time they visit my websites. For some users this is not even possible due to network permissions that reset their settings as soon as they log out. Maybe sometime in the future when it's more widely supported we can think about adopting it :) It’s as simple as this. I don’t want my IE users to have to install a plugin each time they visit my websites. For some users this is not even possible due to network permissions that reset their settings as soon as they log out. Maybe sometime in the future when it’s more widely supported we can think about adopting it :)

]]>