<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quark Are Different&#8230; Kinda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/09/13/quark-are-different-kinda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/09/13/quark-are-different-kinda/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:35:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AlexW</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/09/13/quark-are-different-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-15975</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 23:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1203#comment-15975</guid>
		<description>Nice job.

The &#039;tricked up&#039; version is a bevelled to within an inch of it&#039;s life and will age pretty quickly, but the flat version is a really good foundation logo. You could imagine them reversing it, chroming it, running leopard spots over it. Very versatile.

Have to have a crack at &lt;a href=&quot;http://quarkvsindesign.com/news/archives/2006/03/quarks-logo-2006-something-is-in-motion/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the site that announced it&lt;/a&gt; though. 

Why change the name of something that your audience already understands (i.e. a &#039;Search&#039; text field) to the name of something else they know about (&#039;Pathfinder&#039; - an Adobe drawing tool), but that is completely unrelated to the concept of searching? Hmmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job.</p>
<p>The &#8216;tricked up&#8217; version is a bevelled to within an inch of it&#8217;s life and will age pretty quickly, but the flat version is a really good foundation logo. You could imagine them reversing it, chroming it, running leopard spots over it. Very versatile.</p>
<p>Have to have a crack at <a href="http://quarkvsindesign.com/news/archives/2006/03/quarks-logo-2006-something-is-in-motion/" rel="nofollow">the site that announced it</a> though. </p>
<p>Why change the name of something that your audience already understands (i.e. a &#8216;Search&#8217; text field) to the name of something else they know about (&#8217;Pathfinder&#8217; &#8211; an Adobe drawing tool), but that is completely unrelated to the concept of searching? Hmmm&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Yank</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/09/13/quark-are-different-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-15840</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Yank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1203#comment-15840</guid>
		<description>Quark has had another go at its rebranding, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://quarkvsindesign.com/news/archives/2006/03/quarks-logo-2006-something-is-in-motion/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the results&lt;/a&gt; are more distinctive this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quark has had another go at its rebranding, and <a href="http://quarkvsindesign.com/news/archives/2006/03/quarks-logo-2006-something-is-in-motion/" rel="nofollow">the results</a> are more distinctive this time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artemis</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/09/13/quark-are-different-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-8791</link>
		<dc:creator>artemis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1203#comment-8791</guid>
		<description>I recently noticed that Abbey National have changed there logo yet again but at least this time they don&#039;t look like a beauty parlour http://www.abbey.com/ I like the quark logo but it is a shame that it is so un-original</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently noticed that Abbey National have changed there logo yet again but at least this time they don&#8217;t look like a beauty parlour <a href="http://www.abbey.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.abbey.com/</a> I like the quark logo but it is a shame that it is so un-original</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew K</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/09/13/quark-are-different-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-8760</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 06:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1203#comment-8760</guid>
		<description>How much did they spend on that sooper piece of original logo design!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much did they spend on that sooper piece of original logo design!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frozentoast</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/09/13/quark-are-different-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-8755</link>
		<dc:creator>Frozentoast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1203#comment-8755</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty confident that the symbol used is part of a dingbat font - which would be worth more than a chuckle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty confident that the symbol used is part of a dingbat font &#8211; which would be worth more than a chuckle.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexW</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/09/13/quark-are-different-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-8727</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1203#comment-8727</guid>
		<description>Yep, I could see that. Nice idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I could see that. Nice idea.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BerislavLopac</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/09/13/quark-are-different-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-8720</link>
		<dc:creator>BerislavLopac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1203#comment-8720</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... It strikes me that it shouldn&#039;t be too difficult to alter that green Q to resemble the tip of a fountain pen while still evoking a letter. And it would be quite appropriate to the application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; It strikes me that it shouldn&#8217;t be too difficult to alter that green Q to resemble the tip of a fountain pen while still evoking a letter. And it would be quite appropriate to the application.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
