<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java applets to gain new life in Mac Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:54:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amar</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-189101</link>
		<dc:creator>amar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/#comment-189101</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I am developing an applet, which has to run on firefox 2.0 in mac 10.4.8.  The problem is that even though my applet runs fine on firefox 2.0 on Mac OS X 10.4.2, it does not even show up on FireFox2.0 in Mac OS X 10.4.8, but the same applet also works fine on safari 2.0.4 on Mac 10.4.8.
Can you please suggest where have i gone wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I am developing an applet, which has to run on firefox 2.0 in mac 10.4.8.  The problem is that even though my applet runs fine on firefox 2.0 on Mac OS X 10.4.2, it does not even show up on FireFox2.0 in Mac OS X 10.4.8, but the same applet also works fine on safari 2.0.4 on Mac 10.4.8.<br />
Can you please suggest where have i gone wrong.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AAUG News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Java applets to gain new life in Mac Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-8436</link>
		<dc:creator>AAUG News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Java applets to gain new life in Mac Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 16:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/#comment-8436</guid>
		<description>[...] SitePoint Blogs » Blog Archive » Java applets to gain new life in Mac Firefox (Via MozillaZine) Firefox 1.5 for Mac OS X will have the Java Embedding Plugin built in to allow the browser to take advantage of the latest version of Java on that platform. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SitePoint Blogs » Blog Archive » Java applets to gain new life in Mac Firefox (Via MozillaZine) Firefox 1.5 for Mac OS X will have the Java Embedding Plugin built in to allow the browser to take advantage of the latest version of Java on that platform. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Is Name Mandatory For Posting Anonymously?</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-8427</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Is Name Mandatory For Posting Anonymously?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/#comment-8427</guid>
		<description>Your history is a bit selective. Microsoft&#039;s JVM was universally praised &lt;strong&gt;when it first came out&lt;/strong&gt; for being the fastest implementation around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your history is a bit selective. Microsoft&#8217;s JVM was universally praised <strong>when it first came out</strong> for being the fastest implementation around.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric.Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-8412</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric.Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 05:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/#comment-8412</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kevin,  Exactly what I wanted to hear.  I&#039;ve used editize on nsius.com, and they absolutely love it....

- Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kevin,  Exactly what I wanted to hear.  I&#8217;ve used editize on nsius.com, and they absolutely love it&#8230;.</p>
<p>- Eric</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Yank</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-8409</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Yank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 04:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/#comment-8409</guid>
		<description>Right now, our approach to Editize is to keep it stable and cross-browser/platform compatible for the customers who have paid for it. The current version of Editize is quite successful on these fronts, so we&#039;ve had to make very few if any bug fixes over the past few months.

As for development of significant new features, I&#039;m hoping to be able to do a major 3.0 release sometime next year, but it all depends on where SitePoint&#039;s priorities will lie at that time. If we can justify the work involved, I&#039;d like Editize 3.0 to fully support CSS, and present users with a set of content formatting tools specifically adapted to the styles in use on your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now, our approach to Editize is to keep it stable and cross-browser/platform compatible for the customers who have paid for it. The current version of Editize is quite successful on these fronts, so we&#8217;ve had to make very few if any bug fixes over the past few months.</p>
<p>As for development of significant new features, I&#8217;m hoping to be able to do a major 3.0 release sometime next year, but it all depends on where SitePoint&#8217;s priorities will lie at that time. If we can justify the work involved, I&#8217;d like Editize 3.0 to fully support CSS, and present users with a set of content formatting tools specifically adapted to the styles in use on your site.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric.Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-8407</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric.Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 03:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/08/31/java-applets-to-gain-new-life-in-mac-firefox/#comment-8407</guid>
		<description>A little off topic, but what&#039;s going on with editize?  Been months without word.

 - eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little off topic, but what&#8217;s going on with editize?  Been months without word.</p>
<p> &#8211; eric</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
