<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jetty really is lightweight!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/06/21/jetty-really-is-lightweight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/06/21/jetty-really-is-lightweight/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:51:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Blogs &#187; Tomcat sucks&#8230; Is Apache flawed?</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/06/21/jetty-really-is-lightweight/comment-page-1/#comment-18788</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Blogs &#187; Tomcat sucks&#8230; Is Apache flawed?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">119037949#comment-18788</guid>
		<description>[...] I know for a fact that there is plenty of good quality open source Java code in the wild. I&#8217;ve probed into the code of Jetty a number of times, for instance, and have been pleasantly surprised by what I found there. I also know that poor open source code isn&#8217;t just a problem that faced by Java. But Apache is supposed to be a leader in the field. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I know for a fact that there is plenty of good quality open source Java code in the wild. I&#8217;ve probed into the code of Jetty a number of times, for instance, and have been pleasantly surprised by what I found there. I also know that poor open source code isn&#8217;t just a problem that faced by Java. But Apache is supposed to be a leader in the field. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Blogs &#187; Preview: JBuilder 2006 vs. IntelliJ IDEA 5.0</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/06/21/jetty-really-is-lightweight/comment-page-1/#comment-9979</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Blogs &#187; Preview: JBuilder 2006 vs. IntelliJ IDEA 5.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">119037949#comment-9979</guid>
		<description>[...] Over the past couple of weeks, I&#8217;ve jumped back and forth between IDEA 5.0 and JBuilder 2006, working on various projects including complex Web applications, heavy-lifting desktop apps, nimble applets and lightweight mobile games. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over the past couple of weeks, I&#8217;ve jumped back and forth between IDEA 5.0 and JBuilder 2006, working on various projects including complex Web applications, heavy-lifting desktop apps, nimble applets and lightweight mobile games. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
