<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe aquires Macromedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:54:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: toyer90</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/comment-page-1/#comment-3072</link>
		<dc:creator>toyer90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1216959165#comment-3072</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, I didn&#039;t see that one coming!  I can&#039;t see how it&#039;s going to help the design/web/etc fields though.  &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I didn&#8217;t see that one coming!  I can&#8217;t see how it&#8217;s going to help the design/web/etc fields though.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgrosvenor</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/comment-page-1/#comment-3073</link>
		<dc:creator>sgrosvenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1216959165#comment-3073</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is phenomenal news, but has to be approved by government regulators and sharholders of both companies before the merger, so eagerly watch the blogs and newswires as more information comes out. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What does this mean for diluted products such as GoLive and Freehand? In the short term, not a lot I&#039;m sure, but if the merger comes off, then I&#039;m sure there will be product trimming and alignment and they will go. The mainstays, Flash, Coldfusion, Flex, and Dreamweaver will hopefully continue to be developed, whilst the battle between ImageReady and Fireworks MX 2004 looks like a one horse race....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But like I said, its early days, lets sit back and watch the story unfold&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is phenomenal news, but has to be approved by government regulators and sharholders of both companies before the merger, so eagerly watch the blogs and newswires as more information comes out. </p>
<p>What does this mean for diluted products such as GoLive and Freehand? In the short term, not a lot I&#8217;m sure, but if the merger comes off, then I&#8217;m sure there will be product trimming and alignment and they will go. The mainstays, Flash, Coldfusion, Flex, and Dreamweaver will hopefully continue to be developed, whilst the battle between ImageReady and Fireworks MX 2004 looks like a one horse race&#8230;.</p>
<p>But like I said, its early days, lets sit back and watch the story unfold</p>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cranial-bore</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/comment-page-1/#comment-3074</link>
		<dc:creator>cranial-bore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1216959165#comment-3074</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Buy some Adobe shares ;)&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy some Adobe shares ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Harbottle</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/comment-page-1/#comment-3075</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Harbottle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1216959165#comment-3075</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m pretty sure the anti-competitive laws exist to stop competitors merging to create a single company which has a monopoly on a marketplace. You still have Microsoft and others which compete in this space to some extent, so I reckon it will get up!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure the anti-competitive laws exist to stop competitors merging to create a single company which has a monopoly on a marketplace. You still have Microsoft and others which compete in this space to some extent, so I reckon it will get up!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip D</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/comment-page-1/#comment-3076</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1216959165#comment-3076</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought this was some kind of bizarre joke when I first saw the headline, but apparently not.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I reckon this will go one of two ways, either&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;a) it will be hugely beneficial to the web producing community as it will allow for a nice, similar GUI between all of the major apps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;OR&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;b) The attempt to merge all of the apps fails miserably and they end up ruining all of the flagship titles.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like to see myself as a positive thinker, but realistically, I don&#039;t hold out much hope for option a) coming true.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was some kind of bizarre joke when I first saw the headline, but apparently not.</p>
<p>I reckon this will go one of two ways, either</p>
<p>a) it will be hugely beneficial to the web producing community as it will allow for a nice, similar GUI between all of the major apps.</p>
<p><b>OR</b></p>
<p>b) The attempt to merge all of the apps fails miserably and they end up ruining all of the flagship titles.</p>
<p>I like to see myself as a positive thinker, but realistically, I don&#8217;t hold out much hope for option a) coming true.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stonercreek</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/comment-page-1/#comment-3077</link>
		<dc:creator>stonercreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1216959165#comment-3077</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm.... Microsoft IE and Netscape to merge?  Makes about as much sense as this one.  &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;. Microsoft IE and Netscape to merge?  Makes about as much sense as this one.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ct_roy</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/comment-page-1/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>ct_roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1216959165#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;think this one will end up in the courts re: anti-competitiveness. surely this can onyl be bad for the webdev industry? agreed - having a single standard for apps would/is be great. but thats what we have the W3C for.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;having a single vendor will undoubtedly affect the speed of innovation we have seen from both macromedia and adobe with their web products in recent years.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>think this one will end up in the courts re: anti-competitiveness. surely this can onyl be bad for the webdev industry? agreed &#8211; having a single standard for apps would/is be great. but thats what we have the W3C for.</p>
<p>having a single vendor will undoubtedly affect the speed of innovation we have seen from both macromedia and adobe with their web products in recent years.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charmedlover</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/comment-page-1/#comment-3079</link>
		<dc:creator>charmedlover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1216959165#comment-3079</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wish I could buy some Adobe shares because their going to be dominating the market.  In the US aren&#039;t monopolies illegal?  I know Microsoft had issues with that.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could buy some Adobe shares because their going to be dominating the market.  In the US aren&#8217;t monopolies illegal?  I know Microsoft had issues with that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Octal</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/comment-page-1/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>Octal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1216959165#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d like to know what loophole in the anti-competitive law they are exploiting to go ahead with this merger/aquisition&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know what loophole in the anti-competitive law they are exploiting to go ahead with this merger/aquisition</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RockyShark</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/04/18/adobe-aquires-macromedia/comment-page-1/#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator>RockyShark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1216959165#comment-3081</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I see more negatives here than positives. If it goes through, I can see prices going up and software development/improvement slowing down. Not good.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think it will probably go through though. They can argue that other companies are established in the industry (even though they don&#039;t have the dominance) so it won&#039;t actualy be a monopoly. Having said that though - I don&#039;t really know what the law is in the US.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see more negatives here than positives. If it goes through, I can see prices going up and software development/improvement slowing down. Not good.</p>
<p>I think it will probably go through though. They can argue that other companies are established in the industry (even though they don&#8217;t have the dominance) so it won&#8217;t actualy be a monopoly. Having said that though &#8211; I don&#8217;t really know what the law is in the US.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
