<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Helping the Internet Explorer team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: NZ Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/#comment-3840</link>
		<dc:creator>NZ Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">449601554#comment-3840</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure the IE team have heard of Google, or is is blocked within MS? ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.google.com/search?q=%22I+wish+IE+had%22&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22I+wish+IE+supported%22&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm sure a good librarian could help them build better search queries, but those 2 would be a good start&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the IE team have heard of Google, or is is blocked within MS? ;)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22I+wish+IE+had%22" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=%22I+wish+IE+had%22</a><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22I+wish+IE+supported%22" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=%22I+wish+IE+supported%22</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure a good librarian could help them build better search queries, but those 2 would be a good start</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CubitGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/#comment-3841</link>
		<dc:creator>CubitGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">449601554#comment-3841</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;ROFL @ NZ_Joe&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROFL @ NZ_Joe</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cranial-bore</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/#comment-3842</link>
		<dc:creator>cranial-bore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">449601554#comment-3842</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Support for the CSS min-height and min-width comes to mind, although as these are CSS-2 its not really a mistake per-se they they aren't supported now.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Support for the CSS min-height and min-width comes to mind, although as these are CSS-2 its not really a mistake per-se they they aren&#8217;t supported now.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malikyte</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/#comment-3843</link>
		<dc:creator>malikyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">449601554#comment-3843</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'd have to say a proper support for the BOX model would be nice.  I do agree with the :hover wish as Stuart stated in wish #2...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Remove quirks mode?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to say a proper support for the BOX model would be nice.  I do agree with the :hover wish as Stuart stated in wish #2&#8230;</p>
<p>Remove quirks mode?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VodkaFish</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/#comment-3844</link>
		<dc:creator>VodkaFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">449601554#comment-3844</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm with cranial-bore, I'd really like to see min-width and min-height added.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with cranial-bore, I&#8217;d really like to see min-width and min-height added.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkkimaagi</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/#comment-3845</link>
		<dc:creator>Arkkimaagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">449601554#comment-3845</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Proper PNG support without hacks, please!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proper PNG support without hacks, please!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/#comment-3846</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">449601554#comment-3846</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&gt; I'd have to say a proper support for the BOX model would be nice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wish people would stop harping on about this.  Microsoft fixed Internet Explorer's box model in *2001* when they released Internet Explorer 6.0.  It is now *2005*.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your pages are still subject to the broken box model, it's because you are triggering quirks mode with your non-compliant pages, so it's your own damn fault.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Internet Explorer has many, many problems with CSS to complain about, there's no need to make shit up about the box model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> I&#8217;d have to say a proper support for the BOX model would be nice.</p>
<p>I wish people would stop harping on about this.  Microsoft fixed Internet Explorer&#8217;s box model in *2001* when they released Internet Explorer 6.0.  It is now *2005*.</p>
<p>If your pages are still subject to the broken box model, it&#8217;s because you are triggering quirks mode with your non-compliant pages, so it&#8217;s your own damn fault.</p>
<p>Internet Explorer has many, many problems with CSS to complain about, there&#8217;s no need to make shit up about the box model.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">449601554#comment-3847</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This may seem silly but why not just support all standards? If they just support some then I will still have to write hacks for those that aren't supported. Standards are standards and I want them all included in IE, otherwise I will keep encouraging use of other browsers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh, and more importantly, I want Microsoft to support them, not make a 'best attempt to support' them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is this too much to ask?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may seem silly but why not just support all standards? If they just support some then I will still have to write hacks for those that aren&#8217;t supported. Standards are standards and I want them all included in IE, otherwise I will keep encouraging use of other browsers.</p>
<p>Oh, and more importantly, I want Microsoft to support them, not make a &#8216;best attempt to support&#8217; them.</p>
<p>Is this too much to ask?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/#comment-3848</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">449601554#comment-3848</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&gt; This may seem silly but why not just support all standards? If they just support some then I will still have to write hacks for those that aren't supported.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And why would Microsoft care if you have to write hacks?  It's not like the majority of web developers have the option of not working around Internet Explorer's deficiencies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As far as they are concerned, they can bolt on a couple of end-user features to stop people switching, and carry on making web developers cover up Internet Explorer's screw-ups.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In fact, it's probably more beneficial for them to do so - the more that HTML/CSS/DOM are held back, the more likely it is that intranet developers will pick XAML instead.  The web as a platform is threatening to Microsoft, it's in their interests to hold it back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> This may seem silly but why not just support all standards? If they just support some then I will still have to write hacks for those that aren&#8217;t supported.</p>
<p>And why would Microsoft care if you have to write hacks?  It&#8217;s not like the majority of web developers have the option of not working around Internet Explorer&#8217;s deficiencies.</p>
<p>As far as they are concerned, they can bolt on a couple of end-user features to stop people switching, and carry on making web developers cover up Internet Explorer&#8217;s screw-ups.</p>
<p>In fact, it&#8217;s probably more beneficial for them to do so - the more that HTML/CSS/DOM are held back, the more likely it is that intranet developers will pick XAML instead.  The web as a platform is threatening to Microsoft, it&#8217;s in their interests to hold it back.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean C</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/03/10/helping-the-internet-explorer-team/#comment-3849</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">449601554#comment-3849</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wouldn't it be heaven if they fixed all the major IE bugs like the 3-pixel jog, peek-a-boo and box model ;)&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be heaven if they fixed all the major IE bugs like the 3-pixel jog, peek-a-boo and box model ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
