<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hail the WDT &#8212; We are not worthy!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 07:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wranga</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator>Wranga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">364094087#comment-2865</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knobsticle</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>Knobsticle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">364094087#comment-2866</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Use the resize feature to make the screen 240*320, disable all toolbars and the status bar, use the handheld media type and you have yourself a virtual PDA :D&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use the resize feature to make the screen 240*320, disable all toolbars and the status bar, use the handheld media type and you have yourself a virtual PDA :D</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Dahlström</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/#comment-2867</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Dahlström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">364094087#comment-2867</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agree. The WDT really make life easy for web developers, but I have another favourite too. &lt;a href="https://addons.update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?application=firefox&#38;version=1.0%20&#38;os=Windows&#38;category=Developer%20Tools&#38;numpg=10&#38;id=271"&gt;ColorZilla&lt;/a&gt; is another brilliant extension that saves me a lot of time if I find a color on the web that I like. So a big thanks to Alex Sirota aswell.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree. The WDT really make life easy for web developers, but I have another favourite too. <a href="https://addons.update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?application=firefox&amp;version=1.0%20&amp;os=Windows&amp;category=Developer%20Tools&amp;numpg=10&amp;id=271">ColorZilla</a> is another brilliant extension that saves me a lot of time if I find a color on the web that I like. So a big thanks to Alex Sirota aswell.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbeninghove</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/#comment-2868</link>
		<dc:creator>jbeninghove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">364094087#comment-2868</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, I especially like that I can validate my (X)HTML and CSS right from the toolbar.  Even with local files.  Very cool!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I especially like that I can validate my (X)HTML and CSS right from the toolbar.  Even with local files.  Very cool!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ant1832</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>ant1832</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">364094087#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Johan I agree, I suggested to Chris that he implement a color picker in web developer when it was in its really early stages, but at the time he had no idea how to make it work.  Now that colorzilla's been out for a while I'm surprised he hasn't added it.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johan I agree, I suggested to Chris that he implement a color picker in web developer when it was in its really early stages, but at the time he had no idea how to make it work.  Now that colorzilla&#8217;s been out for a while I&#8217;m surprised he hasn&#8217;t added it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CubitGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>CubitGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">364094087#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome! When is he adding Expresso?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! When is he adding Expresso?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charmedlover</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/#comment-2871</link>
		<dc:creator>charmedlover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">364094087#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Guess what!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Opera can do almost all of that without a toolbar!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The wonder of the best browser...&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess what!</p>
<p>Opera can do almost all of that without a toolbar!</p>
<p>The wonder of the best browser&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexW</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/#comment-2872</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">364094087#comment-2872</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No argument. Opera is a great browser. But IMHO I don't think it's always a great idea to build this kind of specialized functionality in the browser by default. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As useful as the WDT is to me, my dad and my sisters would have no use for it, so it's presense would only serve to obscure other more useful functions. Using the plug-in architecture to pick and choose functionality seems like a better way of handling it to me.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No argument. Opera is a great browser. But IMHO I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s always a great idea to build this kind of specialized functionality in the browser by default. </p>
<p>As useful as the WDT is to me, my dad and my sisters would have no use for it, so it&#8217;s presense would only serve to obscure other more useful functions. Using the plug-in architecture to pick and choose functionality seems like a better way of handling it to me.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charmedlover</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/#comment-2873</link>
		<dc:creator>charmedlover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">364094087#comment-2873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Opera is only 4 MB, much smaller than FireFox.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All of Opera's features come bundled smaller than FireFox that lacks these features.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some of these features are good though.  Look at disabling images.  This is great for dialup users who want a little faster browsing, or even turning it to cached.  Then you have turning it to User Mode so you can view it as a text browser, turn off images, images and links only, etc.  These are good again for faster browsing.  Then you have the small screen rendering that makes Opera great for mobiles that is easily built in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Packed with features Opera trulely packs a punch compared to FireFox.  So many features in the smallest browser.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do have to say that my siblins like Opera because it's faster on their dialup and they can use some odd features it has to speed it up even more.  They use a lot of the features for things I would have never thought of.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera is only 4 MB, much smaller than FireFox.</p>
<p>All of Opera&#8217;s features come bundled smaller than FireFox that lacks these features.</p>
<p>Some of these features are good though.  Look at disabling images.  This is great for dialup users who want a little faster browsing, or even turning it to cached.  Then you have turning it to User Mode so you can view it as a text browser, turn off images, images and links only, etc.  These are good again for faster browsing.  Then you have the small screen rendering that makes Opera great for mobiles that is easily built in.</p>
<p>Packed with features Opera trulely packs a punch compared to FireFox.  So many features in the smallest browser.</p>
<p>I do have to say that my siblins like Opera because it&#8217;s faster on their dialup and they can use some odd features it has to speed it up even more.  They use a lot of the features for things I would have never thought of.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joengo</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/01/24/hail-the-wdt-we-are-not-worthy/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>joengo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">364094087#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Opera is great. V+XHTML in version 8 is cool. Adding XMLHTTP in version 8 is cool! Why can't they add something like HTMLArea/Midas to Opera?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I love Opera. I still use it from time to time. However, the WDT is really one thing that makes me stick to FF.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera is great. V+XHTML in version 8 is cool. Adding XMLHTTP in version 8 is cool! Why can&#8217;t they add something like HTMLArea/Midas to Opera?</p>
<p>I love Opera. I still use it from time to time. However, the WDT is really one thing that makes me stick to FF.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
