Comments on: PHP Sharp http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/ News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:58:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: scania http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/#comment-775094 scania Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:43:18 +0000 1582436155#comment-775094 tcFnEQ skf83dnbfv9h2v64rn0vm tcFnEQ skf83dnbfv9h2v64rn0vm

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/#comment-15372 Anonymous Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:55:19 +0000 1582436155#comment-15372 <blockquote>Remember the “Clipper” compiler for dBASE III?</blockquote> Have a look at <a href="http://www.xharbour.org/" rel="nofollow"> and </a><a href="http://www.xharbour.com/" rel="nofollow"></a>

Remember the “Clipper” compiler for dBASE III?

Have a look at and

]]> By: QJustQ http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/#comment-11509 QJustQ Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:21:26 +0000 1582436155#comment-11509 OK, so I just want to create stand-alone exe's running from the command-line using PHP5 classes and extensions and not have to distribute my source code. In this case, a compiler to exe is what I want. Remember the "Clipper" compiler for dBASE III? OK, so I just want to create stand-alone exe’s running from the command-line using PHP5 classes and extensions and not have to distribute my source code.

In this case, a compiler to exe is what I want.

Remember the “Clipper” compiler for dBASE III?

]]> By: SitePoint Blogs » Phalanger—better than the real thing? http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/#comment-10921 SitePoint Blogs » Phalanger—better than the real thing? Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:37:15 +0000 1582436155#comment-10921 [...] Have mentioned Phalanger before—a complete re-implementation of PHP for .NET. It’s come a long way since then and they released version 1.0 RC2 last month with a change log that suggests they’ve got common use cases covered and are moving on to “nice to have” edge cases. They’ve also reported success with running phpMyAdmin, phpBB2 and PHP-Nuke under Phalanger. [...] […] Have mentioned Phalanger before—a complete re-implementation of PHP for .NET. It’s come a long way since then and they released version 1.0 RC2 last month with a change log that suggests they’ve got common use cases covered and are moving on to “nice to have” edge cases. They’ve also reported success with running phpMyAdmin, phpBB2 and PHP-Nuke under Phalanger. […]

]]> By: M36Teen http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/#comment-1612 M36Teen Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 1582436155#comment-1612 <p>*choke* Uhh *cough* we uhh *keels over* I'll have to get back with on this a little later - after I finish choking!</p> *choke* Uhh *cough* we uhh *keels over* I’ll have to get back with on this a little later - after I finish choking!

]]> By: MiiJaySung http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/#comment-1613 MiiJaySung Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 1582436155#comment-1613 <p>Despite the closed source system that is around now, I'm sure it won't be long before someone looks into getting it to work with Mono now it's been mentioned in the Public domain.</p> <p>Anyway, it seems interesting, along with the possible plans that PHP might also get ported to work on the Parrot VM. With any luck, us PHP'ers will have the choice between the two maybe in another 18 months ;)</p> Despite the closed source system that is around now, I’m sure it won’t be long before someone looks into getting it to work with Mono now it’s been mentioned in the Public domain.

Anyway, it seems interesting, along with the possible plans that PHP might also get ported to work on the Parrot VM. With any luck, us PHP’ers will have the choice between the two maybe in another 18 months ;)

]]> By: yousf http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/#comment-1614 yousf Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 1582436155#comment-1614 <p>hey man!<br /> who wants this UGLY .NET frame work!<br /> I really like my Apache personal server, which run on my XP windows.</p> hey man!
who wants this UGLY .NET frame work!
I really like my Apache personal server, which run on my XP windows.

]]> By: agile http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/#comment-1615 agile Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 1582436155#comment-1615 <p>The work news coming out of 'IronPHP' looks interesting as well, re: http://numbers.wordnerd.org/blog/</p> The work news coming out of ‘IronPHP’ looks interesting as well, re: http://numbers.wordnerd.org/blog/

]]> By: JNKlein http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/#comment-1616 JNKlein Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 1582436155#comment-1616 <p>Interesting concept ... and certainly a worthy exercise ... but why PHP.NET? Sort of defeats the advantages PHP has in speedy development and ease of use!</p> Interesting concept … and certainly a worthy exercise … but why PHP.NET? Sort of defeats the advantages PHP has in speedy development and ease of use!

]]> By: Ian Bicking http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/12/26/php-sharp/#comment-1617 Ian Bicking Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 1582436155#comment-1617 <p>The function library is the easy part -- you just do it one at a time, implementing according to the documentation. Other issues are more difficult, like reimplementing the OO quirks, making the basic data structures perform well, etc. Once you've implemented the language properly, it's "only" a matter of putting in time to implement the library.</p> The function library is the easy part — you just do it one at a time, implementing according to the documentation. Other issues are more difficult, like reimplementing the OO quirks, making the basic data structures perform well, etc. Once you’ve implemented the language properly, it’s “only” a matter of putting in time to implement the library.

]]>