<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taming MySQL Administration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:23:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: terrina</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-873302</link>
		<dc:creator>terrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">655300994#comment-873302</guid>
		<description>When reviewing my database integration classes from a PHP based application, I noticed that the method used to register a new user employed three individual queries: one to check if there already was a duplicate username in the system, another to check if there already was a project name assigned against the one requested, and one to insert the userâ€™s inputted data. Granted, not all three would execute every time a user tried to register, but all three were required for a successful registration. Combine this with n amount of failed attempts, each resulting in either one or two added queries, and you can see that this particularly simple registration process was adding a lot of unnecessary overhead.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.administrationjobsuk.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;administration jobs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When reviewing my database integration classes from a PHP based application, I noticed that the method used to register a new user employed three individual queries: one to check if there already was a duplicate username in the system, another to check if there already was a project name assigned against the one requested, and one to insert the userâ€™s inputted data. Granted, not all three would execute every time a user tried to register, but all three were required for a successful registration. Combine this with n amount of failed attempts, each resulting in either one or two added queries, and you can see that this particularly simple registration process was adding a lot of unnecessary overhead.<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
<a href="http://www.administrationjobsuk.com" rel="nofollow">administration jobs</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrina</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-873299</link>
		<dc:creator>terrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">655300994#comment-873299</guid>
		<description>When reviewing my database integration classes from a PHP based application, I noticed that the method used to register a new user employed three individual queries: one to check if there already was a duplicate username in the system, another to check if there already was a project name assigned against the one requested, and one to insert the userâ€™s inputted data. Granted, not all three would execute every time a user tried to register, but all three were required for a successful registration. Combine this with n amount of failed attempts, each resulting in either one or two added queries, and you can see that this particularly simple registration process was adding a lot of unnecessary overhead.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
terrina
&lt;a&gt;administration jobs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When reviewing my database integration classes from a PHP based application, I noticed that the method used to register a new user employed three individual queries: one to check if there already was a duplicate username in the system, another to check if there already was a project name assigned against the one requested, and one to insert the userâ€™s inputted data. Granted, not all three would execute every time a user tried to register, but all three were required for a successful registration. Combine this with n amount of failed attempts, each resulting in either one or two added queries, and you can see that this particularly simple registration process was adding a lot of unnecessary overhead.<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
terrina<br />
<a>administration jobs</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrina</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-873293</link>
		<dc:creator>terrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">655300994#comment-873293</guid>
		<description>When reviewing my database integration classes from a PHP based application, I noticed that the method used to register a new user employed three individual queries: one to check if there already was a duplicate username in the system, another to check if there already was a project name assigned against the one requested, and one to insert the userâ€™s inputted data. Granted, not all three would execute every time a user tried to register, but all three were required for a successful registration. Combine this with n amount of failed attempts, each resulting in either one or two added queries, and you can see that this particularly simple registration process was adding a lot of unnecessary overhead.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
terrina
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.administrationjobsuk.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;administration jobs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When reviewing my database integration classes from a PHP based application, I noticed that the method used to register a new user employed three individual queries: one to check if there already was a duplicate username in the system, another to check if there already was a project name assigned against the one requested, and one to insert the userâ€™s inputted data. Granted, not all three would execute every time a user tried to register, but all three were required for a successful registration. Combine this with n amount of failed attempts, each resulting in either one or two added queries, and you can see that this particularly simple registration process was adding a lot of unnecessary overhead.<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
terrina<br />
<a href="http://www.administrationjobsuk.com" rel="nofollow">administration jobs</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jumanjee</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-741555</link>
		<dc:creator>Jumanjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">655300994#comment-741555</guid>
		<description>hey friends, everyone thinking of stable db management tool with all features in one. then just go for sqlyog which has even free community version. it  has even good gui. highly recommendable ....just try it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey friends, everyone thinking of stable db management tool with all features in one. then just go for sqlyog which has even free community version. it  has even good gui. highly recommendable &#8230;.just try it</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Maturing Development and Management Tools</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-8424</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Maturing Development and Management Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">655300994#comment-8424</guid>
		<description>[...] Introduced to Open Sourcery readers late last year, Navicat has also built its business around the success of MySQL and advanced its management needs. The latest release this summer of Navicat 2005 reflects the products growing maturity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Introduced to Open Sourcery readers late last year, Navicat has also built its business around the success of MySQL and advanced its management needs. The latest release this summer of Navicat 2005 reflects the products growing maturity. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevincheung</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-4864</link>
		<dc:creator>kevincheung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">655300994#comment-4864</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m just looking for an easy-to-use MySQL administration tool. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Blane, thanks for your review and shed me a light.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Before, i have tried using macsql and other applications, and none of them can provide all the features that I need. I especially like the multiple-database connection capabilities, database backup/ restore and remote database connection feature. More, the import/export wizard really save me lots of time to migrate data from different file formats.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am considering to purchase a Windows version for my pc and am comparing Navicat with phpmyadmin to see which one can optimize my daily administration work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kevincheung&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just looking for an easy-to-use MySQL administration tool. </p>
<p>Blane, thanks for your review and shed me a light.</p>
<p>Before, i have tried using macsql and other applications, and none of them can provide all the features that I need. I especially like the multiple-database connection capabilities, database backup/ restore and remote database connection feature. More, the import/export wizard really save me lots of time to migrate data from different file formats.</p>
<p>I am considering to purchase a Windows version for my pc and am comparing Navicat with phpmyadmin to see which one can optimize my daily administration work.</p>
<p>Kevincheung</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tariquesani</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-4865</link>
		<dc:creator>tariquesani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">655300994#comment-4865</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also try DBdesigner from <a href="http://www.fabforce.net/dbdesigner4/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fabforce.net/dbdesigner4/</a>  If you are looking for a tool to handle multiple database engines (and conversion of data to and from them) &#8211;  is an Open Source Project available for Microsoft Windows© 2k/XP and Linux KDE/Gnome. It is release on the GPL.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-4866</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">655300994#comment-4866</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What about this admin tool at mysql.com which is freely available?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.mysql.com/products/administrator/index.html&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about this admin tool at mysql.com which is freely available?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mysql.com/products/administrator/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysql.com/products/administrator/index.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwarrene</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-4867</link>
		<dc:creator>bwarrene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">655300994#comment-4867</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There are numerous MySQL admin tools that can be utilized - many of which I have blogged here.  Navicat is another excellent option, as is MySQL Administrator - which was covered here in its alpha state, for the job of database administration.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe it really comes down to each user choosing a feature set that works for their platform and environment.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are numerous MySQL admin tools that can be utilized &#8211; many of which I have blogged here.  Navicat is another excellent option, as is MySQL Administrator &#8211; which was covered here in its alpha state, for the job of database administration.</p>
<p>I believe it really comes down to each user choosing a feature set that works for their platform and environment.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KillBill3</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/10/06/taming-mysql-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>KillBill3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">655300994#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i had a look at this about 18 months ago but prefered phpmyadmin for simplicity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;but thanks for bringing it to my attention again, i will be taking another look at it soon :)&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had a look at this about 18 months ago but prefered phpmyadmin for simplicity.</p>
<p>but thanks for bringing it to my attention again, i will be taking another look at it soon :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
