<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo Flasher Effect Panel for Flash MX 2004 Professional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/09/22/photo-flasher-effect-panel-for-flash-mx-2004-professional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/09/22/photo-flasher-effect-panel-for-flash-mx-2004-professional/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sergeant</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/09/22/photo-flasher-effect-panel-for-flash-mx-2004-professional/#comment-7828</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergeant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1024719416#comment-7828</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;how useless is this effect? It looks pretty crappy I have to say&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how useless is this effect? It looks pretty crappy I have to say</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgrosvenor</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/09/22/photo-flasher-effect-panel-for-flash-mx-2004-professional/#comment-7829</link>
		<dc:creator>sgrosvenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1024719416#comment-7829</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This effect takes some of the built in transition effects that are utilised within FL MX 2004 Professional screens and forms and allows them to be used with MCs on the stage. 'Constructive' feedback as always appreciated ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This effect takes some of the built in transition effects that are utilised within FL MX 2004 Professional screens and forms and allows them to be used with MCs on the stage. &#8216;Constructive&#8217; feedback as always appreciated ;-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asp_funda</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/09/22/photo-flasher-effect-panel-for-flash-mx-2004-professional/#comment-7830</link>
		<dc:creator>asp_funda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1024719416#comment-7830</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Steve, your panels don't work with the new Flash 7.2 as I tried installing them on a friend's PC who's just got the latest FlashMX 2004 &#038; on installing any of your panels, it says "invalid extension". Know what the problem is? B'coz as it happens, they install quite alright on the FlashMX 2004 Pro(v7) with update installed seperately.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, your panels don&#8217;t work with the new Flash 7.2 as I tried installing them on a friend&#8217;s PC who&#8217;s just got the latest FlashMX 2004 &#038; on installing any of your panels, it says &#8220;invalid extension&#8221;. Know what the problem is? B&#8217;coz as it happens, they install quite alright on the FlashMX 2004 Pro(v7) with update installed seperately.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgrosvenor</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/09/22/photo-flasher-effect-panel-for-flash-mx-2004-professional/#comment-7831</link>
		<dc:creator>sgrosvenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1024719416#comment-7831</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What version of Extension Manager is being run with your friends PC?, I've tested on v1.6.062, with no problems&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What version of Extension Manager is being run with your friends PC?, I&#8217;ve tested on v1.6.062, with no problems</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCasey</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/09/22/photo-flasher-effect-panel-for-flash-mx-2004-professional/#comment-7832</link>
		<dc:creator>DCasey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1024719416#comment-7832</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is the photo with the child supposed to move to front on mouseover? it doesn't--mozilla 1.7 and ie6 pc. Just curious.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the photo with the child supposed to move to front on mouseover? it doesn&#8217;t&#8211;mozilla 1.7 and ie6 pc. Just curious.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgrosvenor</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/09/22/photo-flasher-effect-panel-for-flash-mx-2004-professional/#comment-7833</link>
		<dc:creator>sgrosvenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1024719416#comment-7833</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Donna, the photo with the child is only supposed to move forward in the stacking order by 1, although it would be easy to modify the technique to bring it to the front rather than 1; so to answer your question, this is by design rather than an unwanted artifact&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna, the photo with the child is only supposed to move forward in the stacking order by 1, although it would be easy to modify the technique to bring it to the front rather than 1; so to answer your question, this is by design rather than an unwanted artifact</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asp_funda</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/09/22/photo-flasher-effect-panel-for-flash-mx-2004-professional/#comment-7834</link>
		<dc:creator>asp_funda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1024719416#comment-7834</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well I think its v1.6.062 on WinXP Pro, though I'm not sure about the version. I'll check it out &#038; let you know.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think its v1.6.062 on WinXP Pro, though I&#8217;m not sure about the version. I&#8217;ll check it out &#038; let you know.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
