<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft using ColdFusion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/07/28/microsoft-using-coldfusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/07/28/microsoft-using-coldfusion/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/07/28/microsoft-using-coldfusion/#comment-382120</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1348170810#comment-382120</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Despite the title of my original post, I think I agree with your post.I know and i agree it was forta who mentioned the site in the i first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Despite the title of my original post, I think I agree with your post.I know and i agree it was forta who mentioned the site in the i first place.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigitalCreation</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/07/28/microsoft-using-coldfusion/#comment-7974</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalCreation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1348170810#comment-7974</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Both of those cases Microsoft bought the company in question. Why replace something that works?    Frankly, if the site *had* to be replaced it would be worse off, the fact that the technology is 'good enough' is fine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There's still plenty of places that uses perl (and possibly broadvision)  on Macromedia.com  should we chastise them too? Oh wait, it was forta who mentioned the site in the first place, so I guess we shouldn't. Even though there isn't one difference between the two.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh wait, didn't Macromedia purchase RoboDemo (ehelp) not long ago? (www.ehelp.com), guess what? It's done in asp. The 'sign up for beta application that MM uses (surveymonkey) done in what? asp.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The entire logic is flawed and it's only good for a quick PR post. Which is essentially what forta is all about now. Mundane PR&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of those cases Microsoft bought the company in question. Why replace something that works?    Frankly, if the site *had* to be replaced it would be worse off, the fact that the technology is &#8216;good enough&#8217; is fine.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s still plenty of places that uses perl (and possibly broadvision)  on Macromedia.com  should we chastise them too? Oh wait, it was forta who mentioned the site in the first place, so I guess we shouldn&#8217;t. Even though there isn&#8217;t one difference between the two.</p>
<p>Oh wait, didn&#8217;t Macromedia purchase RoboDemo (ehelp) not long ago? (www.ehelp.com), guess what? It&#8217;s done in asp. The &#8217;sign up for beta application that MM uses (surveymonkey) done in what? asp.</p>
<p>The entire logic is flawed and it&#8217;s only good for a quick PR post. Which is essentially what forta is all about now. Mundane PR</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mixDev</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/07/28/microsoft-using-coldfusion/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>mixDev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1348170810#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Really microsoft runs FreeBSD servers?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really microsoft runs FreeBSD servers?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vgarcia</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/07/28/microsoft-using-coldfusion/#comment-7976</link>
		<dc:creator>vgarcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1348170810#comment-7976</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The PlaceWare site used to be built with a ton of Java when Microsoft first took it over. I wonder why they switched to CF over .NET though, seems a little odd.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PlaceWare site used to be built with a ton of Java when Microsoft first took it over. I wonder why they switched to CF over .NET though, seems a little odd.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toograffic</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2004/07/28/microsoft-using-coldfusion/#comment-7977</link>
		<dc:creator>toograffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1348170810#comment-7977</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As one of my co-workers says, "It's all just one big company!" There is no spoon....&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of my co-workers says, &#8220;It&#8217;s all just one big company!&#8221; There is no spoon&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
