By Mark Cipolla

The Designer’s Guide to Git or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Repository.

By Mark Cipolla

The designer’s toolset seems to be always expanding. Long gone are the days when a web designer can rely solely on an HTML editor and Photoshop. Now, especially when working in a team with developers, you need to work smarter and more collaboratively.

In this post, I’m going to discuss using Git.

Git is version-control software, originally created by Linus Torvalds (the creator of Linux). It’s main purpose is to track changes to files, so that you can better manage your work.

As a designer, why should you care? Why should you learn a command line to use version control software?

Because Git is fantastic.

In essence, it keeps track of all the changes to your files in a project, so if you break something, Git will be there to help you get back on track. Its powerful tools let you view your changes, helping you fix your code so that it’s free of a certain bug, or see exactly who broke your precious code.

It does, however, have a mantra among its users: Git will do exactly what you say, but not always exactly what you mean. So in this article, I’ll cover both the right way to use it, as well as common pitfalls that would otherwise cause you problems.

The Tree Metaphor

Most source control systems (Git included) use the concept of a tree to describe a repository. A repository is a collection of files and directories (your project), as well as a list of changes to those files over the life of the repository.

The master branch, sometimes referred to as “the trunk,” is the current state of the files in your project. You can create additional branches from the master branch, depending on your needs, or the way you work.

When working with Git, you’ll need to know these terms:

  • Branching creates a copy of a branch, typically the master branch, so that it’s now independent of the one it was created from. It enables you to have a clean slate to make changes to your heart’s content, and when you’re happy with them, you can merge them back in.
  • Merging is like the opposite of branching. You have two branches, and you can merge one branch’s changes into another. At the end of a merge, you still have two branches, but one branch’s changes are now also on the other branch.

Feature branches are a branch off the master branch, and a common way to work when you start on a new feature of your website. When the feature is complete, you can merge it safely back into the master branch. This way, managing the features you’re working on is easy: you can have a whole set of features for a project in progress, and merge back into the master only the features that are finished and working.

Beginning a Repository

To start using Git, you have to install it. Head to to find installers for your operating system.

Once it’s installed, create a folder. I’ll name the one I’m using here sitepointexample:

> mkdir sitepointexample
> cd sitepointexample
> git init
Initialized empty Git repository in /Users/mark/sitepointexample/.git/

[Caveat: I’m a Mac guy. That means the command line is a little different for you Windows users, but the Git commands are mostly the same.]

git init steps up a blank repository. It will return Initialized empty Git repository in /Users//sitepointexample/.git/ letting you know your repo is ready to use.

Local Branch, Remote Branch

It’s quite common to have a remote master. A remote master is a copy of the repository (usually on a server that’s accessible by all the development members of your team) that you can push or pull changes from/to.

I’ll skip going into this in any depth; there are many resources on the Internet that will explain this in more detail.

Status, Add, Commit, Pull, Merge, Push

There are six basic actions you can do with Git. This is by no means all you can do, but in your day-to-day tasks these are the six that you’ll use most often, in this order (apart from merge, which you’ll use less than the other five). Most likely, you’ll learn these by rote; you will definitely use them a lot!


git status shows you everything you need to know about the state of your repository. It shows which branch you’re working on, what files have been changed since they were last committed, and which files Git knows nothing about. It will indicate if files have been moved or deleted, or if there are merges that need to be made manually.

Typically, git status shows three groups of files:

  1. Tracked changes are files that have had git add run on them. These files would be committed if git commit was run.
  2. Untracked changes haven’t had git add run on them, and there are changes that Git knows about, but will do nothing with.
  3. Untracked files are files Git knows nothing about. They are either new files or files that have never been added to the repository.

Below are three commands: a git status telling me I’ve not committed anything yet; I’ve created (or touched) an empty file called README; and I’ve done another git status, telling me I have an untracked file (called README):

> git status
# On branch master
# Initial commit
nothing to commit (create/copy files and use "git add" to track)
> touch README
> git status
# On branch master
# Initial commit
# Untracked files:
#   (use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed)
#       README
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)

git status is the first command to use. Do it before you do anything else, every time.


git add <filename> tells the repository you want to keep track of the changes to a file. You can keep working after you’ve added the changes to the repository, but only the changes up to the point of adding would be committed. You can always add changes over added changes; it won’t lose anything, just keep track of more changes. Once you’ve run git add, you should use git status to make sure that what was added was what you wanted:

> git add README
> git status
# On branch master
# Initial commit
# Changes to be committed:
#   (use "git rm --cached ..." to unstage)
#       new file:   README

So I’ve added the README file, and another git status tells me that when I commit, Git will commit the changes to that file.

In case you’ve added changes in error, you can undo the changes by running git reset HEAD <filename>, which tells the repository not to do anything with the changes. It will not drop any changes you’ve made; it just won’t commit them.


git commit saves the changes to the repository. A commit gives you a commit identifier, a long string of characters (an MD5 hash) that the repository uses to name the point in time the commit was made. These are what you can use in the unfortunate event that you need to roll back to a previous point in time:

>git commit --message 'My First Commit'
[master (root-commit) d602d2b] My First Commit
0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 README

I’ve committed the changes to the file with the --message 'My First Commit'. These are handy hints you can write when you’re checking through the commit log looking for a certain change you made. Make these as descriptive as you can. They save you lots of time when something goes wrong. You can also use -m 'MESSAGE' instead of --message 'MESSAGE' as a short form, saving you time.


git pull pulls in changes other members of your team have made. For this example, I don’t have other team members using the repository (the whole repository is on my machine), but when you do, it will look like this:

> git pull
remote: Counting objects: 118, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (75/75), done.
remote: Total 78 (delta 52), reused 0 (delta 0)
Unpacking objects: 100% (78/78), done.
   36aeed8..8c18ec5  branchname -> origin/branchname
Merge made by recursive.
 .../Resource/otherfile.php                         |   19 ++
 .../Resource/file.php                              |    8 -
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 /Resource/file.php

Some points here:

  1. We use GitHub, a company that hosts repositories. They have excellent documentation and help online. Check them out.
  2. The remote branch is origin/branchname. Typically, origin means the remote server hosting your repository.
  3. 36aeed8..8c18ec5 are the two commit ids: what this means is that Git is updating from the first commit (which you had on your machine, being 36aeed8), to the second (8c18ec5).
  4. Two files were pulled down, and one of them (create mode 100755 /Resource/file.php) was a new file in your repository. It was added by another member of the team.


git merge is used when you have two branches, and you want to take the changes from one and add them to the other branch.

Usually, you’ll have changes on a feature branch and, when you’re happy with the work, you’ll merge the changes in the master:

> git branch otherexample
> git checkout otherexample
Switched to branch 'otherexample'
> git branch
* otherexample
> git add OTHERFILE
> git commit -m 'Other File Added'
[otherexample 16283e5] Other File Added
 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 OTHERFILE
> git checkout master
Switched to branch 'master'
> git status
# On branch master
nothing to commit (working directory clean)
> git merge otherexample
Updating d602d2b..16283e5
 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 OTHERFILE

Here’s what I’ve done:

  1. git branch otherexample creates a new branch, called otherexample.
  2. git checkout otherexample switches to that new branch.
  3. git branch shows what branches I have available. It tells me I have two branches, master and otherexample. [FYI: git branch -r shows what branches origin (the remote server I alluded to earlier) has].
  4. touch OTHERFILE, git add OTHERFILE, and git commit -m 'Other File Added' create a new file on the new branch, tell GIT that you want to commit the change, and commit it with a message of 'Other File Added', just like the steps above.
  5. git checkout master jumps back to the master branch.
  6. git merge otherexample takes the changes on otherexample and merges them into master, the branch you’re on. You can see that it has created the file “OTHERFILE” in your master branch.


git push will push your changes to the remote server, sharing them with your team. When they next git pull, they’ll see your changes.

git push origin master is usually how it’s used. The difference between git push and git push origin master is that the latter will only push the master branch, while the former will try and push all branches.

It would be used, for example, when you want to push just a single feature branch, so that a team member can also see the changes you’ve made to ‘otherbranch’, and you’d use git push origin otherbranch.


And they are the basics of Git. It is, however, a complex beast. There are many, many more commands—some are really helpful, while others are a little dangerous. You can pick out a single commit and merge it into your branch, ignoring all commits after it. You can use Git to find the exact commit where your code was broken. You can roll back to an individual commit you made earlier in the day, the day before, three weeks earlier, or any time along the repository’s timeline.

As the designer’s toolkit expands, we need to take advantage of handy workflow tools that make the most of our day. Use Git, and never lose all your changes again.

  • Sustainable Websites

    If you’re on a Mac, GitBox is an easy-to-use Git GUI that will simplify the process for beginners.

    • Mark Cipolla

      Yep, gitbox is apparently awesome.

      I was first introduced to version control via the command line, and find it hard to make the jump; I’m just so used to it.

    • 4SeeN

      Thanks for the link. I am curious what the difference between there free and paid version will be. I’ve been using the GIT interface in aptana for developing on my mac which so far works pretty good.

  • Edison Leon

    Nice tutorial, thanks for sharing. Though I still living in svn city I heard good things about git, might try visit some day.

    • Mark Cipolla

      It’s a nice place. You should stop by.

  • fattyjules

    My first (and only) source control system is a distributed system called Mercurial. I love using it, it improves the way I think about my projects and gives me peace of mind.

    Can anyone who’s used a distributed system like Mercurial compare it to a centralised system like Git?

    • djadomi

      Git is just as distributed as Mercurial. They basically fill the same niche. Mercurial is just a bit simpler to start using. Git has the advantage of working very simply and effectively with existing Subversion repositories.

    • ablock

      git is decentralized, just like mercurial.

    • Sean

      GIT is also a distributed revision control system like Mercurial. Subversion is a centralised system. One of the biggest benefits of the distributed systems is that they are designed to make branching/merging really easy.

  • In what way is this a “designer’s guide” to Git? It’s simply an intro to Git. It doesn’t cover anything specific to designers.

    • Mark Cipolla

      I see what you mean, but I was looking at it this way: I’m a designer, and this is the stuff I wish I was told from day one.

      I found myself in a team with developers (all of whom were well versed in using the command line), and having this stuff explained would’ve helped me a bit, I think.

  • rwilcher

    more like design maintenance guide. Really have to go to gittutorial to
    learn how to use the beast. It’s a really complex system. Seeing as it’s
    used by the linux kernel developers, I guess it’s good enough for my stuff.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve never used a version control system before, but I’m working on a project now where it would be very helpful. Thanks for writing this up, I’ll have to check GIT out.

  • ammark

    i have a question. few days back the admin guy deleted some of my css from server as he is a fool. now to cover his tracks he also deleted the entry in show revisions. now i am hoping someway i can get the log info anyway back. as i do have access to server but i can’t figure out who deleted my css entries. is there a way to work around this problem?

  • Darren884

    Nice article.

  • yogomozilla

    If you want a decentralised version control system with a decent GUI, have a look at Bazaar (bzr):
    Works on the same principles as Git and other DVCS, has plugins to communicate with Git and other VCS plus it’s Python and the GUI is written in Qt so it’s as x-platform as you like.

    Nothing beats the shell, though.

  • Kamal Morjal

    Great article! Version control in the workflow of designers is a necessity rather than an option. Switching back to older versions, branching, making changes, merging back what you like, that’s pretty much the easiest to do with VCS like Git without having to create n copies of a file or the entire project. It has saved my day time and again.

  • Daniel Laidler

    Great Article!

  • john orton

    Thanks for sharing it.

  • Jeff

    I take it you don’t know this is a profanity in England? It stems from ‘Get’, which is a very derogatory term for the child (often illegitimate) of a person you don’t like much. Or it describes an idiot or contemptible person.
    I’m 54 but my dad would still give me a clip round the ear if I said I was using something called ‘Git’.

    • Mark Cipolla

      I’m familiar with the origins of the word, and legend has it that Linus Torvalds (the Linux guy, and the creator of Git) named it thusly as a self-deprecating joke.

      And for what it’s worth, my dad would probably do the same!

      • Jeff

        LOL – well that’s alright then :)

  • clintonG

    What’s your experience with planned redundancy; backing up git and the data it manages to different disks as a well-designed disaster recovery plan would entail?

    • Mark Cipolla

      To be honest, I’ve not really worried about it.

      For pretty much all of my projects, I use GitHub. And they take care of all the nonsense like backing up.

      But, as always, backing up the repos is really important. You could always zip up the repo (maybe cron-able, and you’d have to do a git reset HARD if you need to restore it…), but a better way may be git bundle. I’m not 100% sure it’s what you’d want (surely there’s some Git experts out there that can clarify).

Get the latest in Front-end, once a week, for free.