Programming - - By Wyatt Barnett

Page_Load is Evil

We have all seen it, sitting there, waiting for code, when we first open a page in code view. The handy Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) method.

Well, friends, I am here today to tell you that this method is evil. That’s right, this nice friendly delegate is actually evil. And here is why:

  1. It encourages doing everything when the page loads by raw convenience. And doing all that inside this one method. I have seen 300+ line Page_Load methods on an alarmingly regular basis. I have seen entire websites programmed into Page_Load methods. Probably 95% of the ASP.NET code running in this world lives in a Page_Load method.
  2. It obfuscates page life-cycle from inexperienced developers. Too many just use Page_Load because that is the only way they know to get code to execute when a page is requested, save handling postback events.
  3. Page_Load is too late to do some things, like add controls, confusing some developers.
  4. Page_Load is too early to do some things, like deal with button clicks, confusing some developers.
  5. From a maintainability perspective, it makes it difficult to move actions into different places of the page-life cycle when necessary.

OMG! THAT IS EVIL! What am I to do!?!?!?!

So, you are not to use Page_Load, what is one to use? Well, one should just wire up page events manually in the constructor.

Why is this a the superior method? First, your actions can be logically grouped into their own methods, rather than having them live as 20 line segments of a monster Page_Load() method. Second, and most important, is that you can easily move a method around in the page lifecycle by changing the name of the event it is attached to. Finally, you are left with much cleaner, much more intelligible code.

Sponsors