Design & UX
By Alex Walker

Designing Droids: From Metropolis to Huey, Dewey and Louie

By Alex Walker

C3 PO and R2-D2

Early Thursday morning I attended a midnight opening night screening of 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens'.

It's amazing to me to think that it was way back in February of 2013 that Disney announced there would be a new Star Wars film for the first time in a decade.

A long time ago…

Over the last ten years, poor ol' George Lucas has been under the blazing ‘nerd blowtorch’ for those prequels – some of it probably justified. But while we might question some of his directorial and screenwriting decisions, there's one thing that's beyond question:

George Lucas was a brilliant visionary.

As designers, I think we can still learn a lot from George's ability to research, to collect a bunch of weird and disparate inspirations and re-assemble them into a new, captivating and original whole. I want to touch on that ability today.


The Droids We're Looking For

As much as Star Wars is a story about farmboy with wanderlust, the truth is that it's two droids that drive the story in the first half 'A New Hope'. In fact, we barely see a human for the first 20 minutes. It's essentially a tin man and a rolling trash can in the desert – so if his robots can't carry the story, the film dies. Why did he do this?

The Hidden Fortress

The Hidden Fortress

It's well documented that Lucas borrowed large parts of the story of 'A New Hope' from Akira Kurosawa's The Hidden Fortress (1958).

That film begins with two squabbling peasants – a tall one and a short one – trekking through the wilderness to join a rebellion. The peasants are played mostly for their 'three-stooges-like' comic value, but we also see the story through their eyes.

'The Hidden Fortress' also includes a sassy, independent princess, a secret treasure and, yes… a hidden fortress. But Lucas knew the success of his two droids-peasants was critical to his story.

Designing C-3PO

Metropolis poster

George Lucas's golden droid was a very original blend of old and new ideas on what a robot should be. The visual design borrows from 'Maria' in Fritz Lang's Metropolis (1927), probably the most famous robot in early cinema.

However, like most humanoid robots in 20th cinema, she is not to be trusted. In fact, 20th-century movies generally tell you that the more human a robot looks (or sounds), the more dangerous they are (WestWorld, Alien (Ash), Hal-9000).

If a robot was trustworthy, it had to be mechanical, monotone and determinedly non-human, like Robby the Robot in Forbidden Planet.

C-3PO was different – more like a blending of the Cowardly Lion's fretting in the Tin Man's body. Not a hero but certainly not a villain either. Somehow C-3PO managed to feel both completely original and instantly familiar at the same time. That's hard to do.

Designing R2-D2

If C-3PO could perform a role mostly like a human character, R2-D2 was a much braver decision. This little tin can needs to help drive the story, even though he has:

  • no eyes
  • no facial expressions
  • no understandable language
  • not even shoulders to shrug to hands to throw up

On the surface, it's like trying to get important plot exposition out of a coffee machine. It must have seemed a crazy decision for people arriving on the set.

Silent Running: Huey Dewey and Louie.

But two years earlier Lucas had seen a relatively little-known sci-fi film called 'Silent Running (1972) that inspired him.

Silent Running is set in a dystopian future where Earth is a dead planet, but plant and animal life has been preserved in giant floating space domes (yes, Wall-E also draws from this film). Bruce Dern plays the part of 'Freeman Lowell', one of the men charged with maintaining these nature domes until life can be returned.

Lowell is aided by three small service 'drones' – Huey, Louie and Dewey – who become his main companions for the film.

Like R2-D2, these drones are short, faceless and very industrial looking, yet as Lowell teaches them to care for plants and even play poker, they show personality. Even though they couldn't smile or frown or shake their fist, Lucas saw that they were still able to drive the story forward like a human character.

Cheryl Sparks inside Huey

In fact, the drones were given life by four amputee actors – Mark Persons (Dewey), Cheryl Sparks and Steven Brown (Huey) and Larry Whisenhunt (Louie). Kenny Baker (R2-D2) must have drawn a lot from watching their performances.

Silent Running didn't get a lot of attention at the time, but was a critical influence on George Lucas.

A Salute to George Lucas

Sigmund and the Sea Monster meets the Bay City Rollers.

You probably only need to watch about 10 minutes of something like H.R. Pufnstuf or Sigmund and the Sea Monsters to get a feel for the contempt that kid's fantasy entertainment was held in till the early 70’s. “They’re kids! Give ’em any ol’ garbage. Just paint it bright colors and they lap it up!” seemed to be the approach of producers. Cheap sets, tacky costumes, awful dialogue, and idiotic plots.

By contrast, Star Wars was smart, creative, intricately-planned and took the art of storytelling more seriously than any kid-friendly fantasy drama before it. It's little wonder that people lost their tiny minds in 1977.

The bar was raised and movies were never the same again. Mr. George Lucas – I’ll be forever grateful to you for that.

Originally published in the SitePoint Design Newsletter.

  • jaystrab

    This was a good article up until the end. The author obviously did not grow up during the 70s.

    You realize that H.R. Pufnstuf and Sigmund the Sea Monster are TV shows with fairly low budgets, right? Not a movie. And they had 20 minutes or less to tell a story. For what they had to work with they created some pretty cool looking costumes (albeit drug induced). And I don’t think anyone would argue that Teletubbies is better than any show of the 70s. It’s far worse and has a more disturbing (and less fun) viewpoint of what they thought kids should like at the time.

    The 70s also saw the rise of Sesame Street and The Muppets. And let’s not forget, if we are going to throw TV shows into the mix, that there were a few Star Wars ones: The Ewok Adventure and the Droids and Ewoks cartoon series in the 80s that were less than stellar with some story lines far worse than H.R. Pufnstuf.

    The original Star Wars is awesome. I saw it 7 times in the theater when it came out when I was in the first grade, but let’s not give Lucas more credit than he is due. “There’s one thing that’s beyond question:” he’s no Kubrick. I know he’s not trying to be, but he went a bit overboard in Return of the Jedi in trying to make it “kid friendly.”

    • I’m 46, jaystrab , so I have my ’70’s kids’ card.

      I’m not here to defend all of George Lucas’s failings, and certainly the signs were not good by the end of Jedi. He seemed to gradually lose his sense of what it was that people liked about Star Wars.

      I also totally agree that H.R. Puffnstuff had no worse production values than Sesame Street or Teletubbies or Yo Gabba Gabba. The difference is, Sesame Street, Yo Gabba Gabba and Teletubbies are targeted at under-5s. If H.R. Puffnstuff taught alphabet and numbers, I’d look at it quite differently.

      H.R. Puffnstuff was aimed at school-aged kids – to me it always felt like Ronald McDonald’s acid nightmare. Never enjoyed it as a kid (and my standards were *not* high ;) )
      and haven’t changed my opinion since re-watching it.

      In fact, for all its day-glo paint and googly eyes, the central theme of a boy kidnapped by a witch was pretty dark. What were Jimmy’s parents thinking? Are the police combing the lakeside with sniffer dogs? Trawling the lake? These are the questions 8-year-old Alex was asking himself.

      In Wizard of Oz, Dorothy gets unwillingly transported to another world, but the key resolution of the story is she gets home! Every step she takes and every decision she makes is towards that goal. Poor Jimmy is trapped.

      Hehe, anyway I enjoy talking about this stuff. Sounds like you got more out of the Kroffts than I did.

      • Suzanne Lewis

        I am getting a salary of more than 3900 dollars each week , that is awesome. Over a year ago I was in a horrible condition , jobless and Bank account with only few bucks . Thank one of my friends showed me a way where I was able to gather my self and making average of 85 d/h. So it can change your life as it has changed mine.



Get the latest in Design, once a week, for free.