Hey everyone!
I’ve been working primarily with React for a few years now, but with all the noise around frameworks like Svelte, SolidJS, and even Qwik => I’m starting to wonder: which front-end framework actually feels the most “future-proof” in 2025?
I’m curious what developers here are leaning towards long-term not just in terms of popularity, but developer experience, performance, community support, and adaptability to upcoming trends (like AI integrations, edge rendering, etc.)
Would love to hear your thoughts especially from folks who’ve shifted stacks recently or are exploring beyond the usual suspects.
What’s your go-to front-end stack today and why?
No framework at all. Only Vanilla JS, Pure CSS and Pure HTML. As foundation I use Go with its built in html templates.
My goal is simplicity, safety, speed and maintainability. It is easier to maintain if you know what is behind all magic. How it works. And a compiled language (C, C++, Go etc) are faster than an interpreted language. And by nature safer (interpreted is normally readable by humans).
The cost of this increased speed and maintainability is that it takes longer time to market, but I think it is worth it as I hopefully know what I am doing.
And as a bonus I can use smaller VPS as the footprint (CPU, memory, network and disc) is significant smaller. A compiled Go executable (about 30 pages) occupy only about 10-20 MB in disk space. And with builtin “engine”. So I save money in the long run.
5 Likes
Given that your list of “all the noise” just sounded like random words to me and i had to look them up, I’m perhaps not the best one to weigh in. That or perhaps ‘all the noise’ isnt quite as loud as you think it is?
There isnt a “long term” anything in this field. React was started 11 years ago. Svelte 8, SolidJS 6 (but if you count 1.0 as the initial release, 4), and Qwik was created by the guy who created Angular (so how did his “long term” planning go?) 3 years ago. These things barely fit into an employer’s bog-standard “where do you see yourself in the future” questionaire, let alone “future-proof”.
Future-proofing is learning your core fundamentals of programming, HTML, Javascript, and CSS. Frameworks are built on top of these things, and yes they can help you, they can speed things up. But if you dont understand the underlying technology, when something goes wrong, or the horse you’ve put your bet on goes away… eh.
At best, the answer is “The framework you’re currently using. Until you need to use something else. Then that. If you want adaptability in your framework, have adaptability to use any framework.”
4 Likes
True, the frameworks come & go, and betting the farm on one future-proof tool is risky. focusing on HTML, CSS & JavaScript is like learning to drive rather than obsessing over the car model. Once you have that switching frameworks is more of a learning curve than a full reset.
Do you think there is any value in choosing a framework based on community health or job market demand in 2025?
If you want to get a job, you are forced to (more or less) use the employers “company policy”. I have repeatedly found a pattern or four main languages, but their framework may differ.
Hence I should first ask myself “what is my passion?”, then ask my desired future employer “which language do you use?”. And start learning their language of choice and then add learning the framework (if necessary).
-
Java (and relatives like C#): Java remains a cornerstone for enterprise applications due to its scalability and strong community. C# follows closely, particularly in .NET environments (Read Windows?).
-
Python: Python is everywhere—from web development to AI, machine learning, and data science. Companies use it for rapid prototyping and diverse applications.
-
JavaScript: The backbone of web development, JavaScript is essential for frontend and increasingly popular in backend development with frameworks like Node.js. It’s hard to imagine tech moving forward without it.
-
C (and relatives like C++, Go): C and C++ are for system-level programming, and high-performance applications. Go adds simplicity and efficiency for micro services and cloud-based solutions.
All serve different purposes. For example, I have found if you target web development in common, Javascript is the foundation.
And I have also observed a slowly evolving trend towards “clean architecture”, that in many cases increase the long term maintainability by avoiding rapidly evolving versions of frameworks (front end or back end) (which also may break your code).
1 Like
So practical, Starting with passion & then mapping it to what is actually being used in the real world is such a smart approach. Too often people dive into a language or framework just because it’s trending without thinking about where they actually want to go.
Clean Architecture is also refreshing. with how fast front-end tools evolve, it is easy to end up with brittle code that does not age well.
Have you noticed more companies caring less about specific languages & more about adaptability & problem solving skills lately?
I have not noticed any trends about “problem solving skills”. It is expected as a natural part of developing since eons.
And I think that it is about different types of problem solving on which type of business you work in. Creating web sites is quite different from app development or applications for micro computers.
And most company choose a path (language) early and stick to it. Switching back and forth is a disaster for profitability IMO.
2 Likes
Agreed. It takes a monumental event (such as the language becoming EOL) to get a company to change tracks.
“Community health” is an even more fickle beast these days. One bad patch can evaporate a community’s health instantaneously. I would consider a community’s health in the initial stages of learning (“How hard is it going to be for me to get help”), but not for long term planning.
Job Market demand is also fickle, though less volatile due to the above points by @sibertius. If you have a specific job at a specific company in mind, then its fine. But its not like the job market looks at the rest of the job market and says “We should go with [insert framework here] because other companies are using it today”. If your company has done that, I pity them, because that’s a poor decision making process.
A company will have their specific stack of languages/tools/OS/etc that they use. But across the spectrum of companies, you’ll find a stack of pretty much anything and everything.
And its worth saying not every job at a company will use the full stack. The Database Admin isnt going to be expected to know HTML like the back of their hand. The QA isnt going to be expected to have a comprehensive knowledge of the backend of SQL. While having the full breadth is beneficial, unless you’re dealing with a very small company, you’ll be specialized. You’re not a one-person operation anymore, which is a major lesson to get through “web developers” heads fresh from doing it all themselves.
1 Like
Totally Agree, especially on how volatile both community health & job market trends can be. It’s wild how quickly a single controversy or breaking change can deflate a once hyped framework. That said I still find a vibrant & active community to be valuable at least when you are learning or trying to debug something quickly.
Also love your point about specialization in larger teams it’s easy to forget that not everyone needs to be a full-stack unicorn. But here’s something I have been wondering lately.
In your experience, how much does a developer’s ability to pick up and adapt to new tools weigh in during hiring or promotions especially when their core stack does not exactly match the company’s?