I’m a beginner to all of this stuff and primarily view myself as a designer who understands the importance of hand-coding. I notice that a lot of people prefer texteditors like Coda, Textmate, etc. over Dreamweaver.
Why is this?
I only use Dreamweaver as a hand-coding environment and always abstain from using its WYSIWYG features. I would think that surely Dreamweaver beats the competition when it comes to FTP and file handling stuff.
Because many people do NOT like hand-coding and don’t mind generated garbage, so long as it’s either valid-enough for them or whatever.
Also, the tools you listed often have other features some find useful, so they may well hand-code but use stuff like code-completion, ftp (gawd dreambeaver’s ftp is known for security holes, unless those have been fixed recently), code folding, whatever.
I would think that surely Dreamweaver beats the competition when it comes to FTP and file handling stuff.
Find and replace things throughout whole folders/sites
Live view while messing with CSS positioning/layout/styles
Messing with image maps (which I rarely do, these days, unless I’m making an ad or a Facebook custom page/header)
Sometimes if I am doing a complicated layout or design, I’ll need to have it up, but I’ll also use Firebug/IE Developer Toolbar or Chrome element inspection to mess with code while viewing a design.
Other than that, I rarely use it. But I’ve gotta buy a copy of it and upgrade it once in awhile, just to do the above.
Thing this is, for hand-coding, DW really is not better than the competition. In fact with both DW (CS5) and Coda on my computers I don’t even open DW and do everything with Coda. The File management is just plain better.