I guess the title says it all. I’m using display: -moz-inline-box for FF2. But that of course doesn’t validate. Now it’s not a big deal if i have to ditch that declaration but i first wanted to check if there’s no trick in letting it passing.
I cared about validation in the begining - I no longer care.
You could hide it in JavaScript. In comes some chimer… “JS off won’t work” - no shiit Sherlock.
Sherlock? Moi??? no shiit
That’s unlike me, I forgot the how… http://www.visibilityinherit.com/code/add-css-with-javascript.php
Nice ones Eric. But if i understand correctly, all of them have the result that the particular style doesn’t exist anymore if BLAH BLAH BLAH. So in the end, i can just remove that style since it targets FF2…
Yes, and if you care about validation, and you don’t want to js it, then just remove the moz stuff. I could be wrong, but I don’t think there are many fx2 users left.
Yeah, that’s my believe also. I totally forgot about the fact that the moz thingie didn’t validate lol
Yeah, that’s my believe also. I totally forgot about the fact that the moz thingie didn’t validate lol
It’s a valid construct though It’s just that the validator can’t possibly know about it.
Some say that the validator should not class it as an error but as a warning as it follows the specifications for vendor extensions.
Yeah, i’m afraid it’s a debate that will go on for a while