hello
i have some restricted sections on my website and have been thinking how to handle them, essentially i have 2 choices, but i don’t know which is better for the user and the search engines:
is it better to turn the restricted page into a access denied page or to redirect the user to a access denied page?
the difference between the 2 is that in one case the user is not redirected anywhere and just sees different content on the same page, while on the other case the user is redirected to a different page that has the sole purpose of being a access denied page.
im just wondering which is better for the user, his browser and the search engines?
p.s. both cases will have a “401 Access denied” header.
The request requires user authentication. The response MUST include a WWW-Authenticate header field (section 14.47) containing a challenge applicable to the requested resource
in my case there is no WWW-Authenticate Header as the authentication is done using PHP (similar to sitepoint for example) instead of HTTP.
so do you suggest i directly serve the page as a login page with a 403 header?
thanks for your suggestion.
edit:
what about average login pages that users might want to visit to login?