<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Average Page Weight Increases 30% in 2012</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/</link> <description>Learn CSS &#124; HTML5 &#124; JavaScript &#124; Wordpress &#124; Tutorials-Web Development &#124; Reference &#124; Books and More</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 20:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Chris Henry</title><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/#comment-1066585</link> <dc:creator>Chris Henry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 20:23:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=60685#comment-1066585</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sure accusing web developers of being lazy is a great way to get this problem fixed, which is also endemic among idiots who have no idea what they&#039;re talking about.
Web development is a collaborative effort, and most devs I know always put performance and speed up at the top. It&#039;s extremely easy for folks to look at the massively fat pipes and deep pockets of the likes of Facebook and Bing, who have done a fantastic job of making delivery of the hi-res, shiny features look extremely easy. But for the average web dev shop with limited time and resources, the best way to get the best product out to the customer is to use multiple libraries. Often times, designers and business parties become extremely uninterested in bandwidth costs when estimates for time and cost rise. I would say the major issue here is technical education to the tune of bandwidth usage.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure accusing web developers of being lazy is a great way to get this problem fixed, which is also endemic among idiots who have no idea what they&#8217;re talking about.</p><p>Web development is a collaborative effort, and most devs I know always put performance and speed up at the top. It&#8217;s extremely easy for folks to look at the massively fat pipes and deep pockets of the likes of Facebook and Bing, who have done a fantastic job of making delivery of the hi-res, shiny features look extremely easy. But for the average web dev shop with limited time and resources, the best way to get the best product out to the customer is to use multiple libraries. Often times, designers and business parties become extremely uninterested in bandwidth costs when estimates for time and cost rise. I would say the major issue here is technical education to the tune of bandwidth usage.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Craig Buckler</title><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/#comment-1066482</link> <dc:creator>Craig Buckler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:16:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=60685#comment-1066482</guid> <description><![CDATA[Mmm, I agree that CMSs have some bloated let&#039;s-handle-every-possibility themes, but you don&#039;t need to use them. I nearly always use custom hand-built themes for that reason.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm, I agree that CMSs have some bloated let&#8217;s-handle-every-possibility themes, but you don&#8217;t need to use them. I nearly always use custom hand-built themes for that reason.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Knockout Games</title><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/#comment-1066372</link> <dc:creator>Dave Knockout Games</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=60685#comment-1066372</guid> <description><![CDATA[WordPress and bloatware CMS / Blogs do not help?? When a web developer builds a site properly he / she controls page weight by only linking / attaching what is needed. Many CMS are all or nothing - usually ALL and they handle image compression poorly. Of course the Jo Bloggs user uploads his 16 Megapixel images for his off-the-shelf  template for &quot;my holiday&quot;.
I guess the web has become more media based and image conscious... and corporates duplicate content over all the channels too. I was an advocate of accessible web design but gave up when iPhone et al came in - it just got too hard to slim down and test everything and site owners demanding more bandwidth hugging bellls and whistles with no care for speed.
Broadband has led to the rich media we all like but is also means that many care less about trimming sites down... So yes websites are now bingeing on bandwidth like they just discovered a virtual fast food joint on the information highway  (very old phrase LOL )]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress and bloatware CMS / Blogs do not help?? When a web developer builds a site properly he / she controls page weight by only linking / attaching what is needed. Many CMS are all or nothing &#8211; usually ALL and they handle image compression poorly. Of course the Jo Bloggs user uploads his 16 Megapixel images for his off-the-shelf  template for &#8220;my holiday&#8221;.</p><p>I guess the web has become more media based and image conscious&#8230; and corporates duplicate content over all the channels too. I was an advocate of accessible web design but gave up when iPhone et al came in &#8211; it just got too hard to slim down and test everything and site owners demanding more bandwidth hugging bellls and whistles with no care for speed.</p><p>Broadband has led to the rich media we all like but is also means that many care less about trimming sites down&#8230; So yes websites are now bingeing on bandwidth like they just discovered a virtual fast food joint on the information highway  (very old phrase LOL )</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Craig Buckler</title><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/#comment-1064497</link> <dc:creator>Craig Buckler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:43:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=60685#comment-1064497</guid> <description><![CDATA[Yes, but take a look at your browser stats. The majority of users look at one or two pages (unless you happen to be Facebook). Even then, caching is not an excuse for optimization.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but take a look at your browser stats. The majority of users look at one or two pages (unless you happen to be Facebook). Even then, caching is not an excuse for optimization.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Fasoldt</title><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/#comment-1064491</link> <dc:creator>Adam Fasoldt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:02:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=60685#comment-1064491</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure that an average of 1.25mb is really a big deal given that, most of the time, that&#039;s a one time thing. After that, with browser cache, you&#039;re looking at 60kb-200kb per page.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that an average of 1.25mb is really a big deal given that, most of the time, that&#8217;s a one time thing. After that, with browser cache, you&#8217;re looking at 60kb-200kb per page.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stevie D</title><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/#comment-1064489</link> <dc:creator>Stevie D</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:58:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=60685#comment-1064489</guid> <description><![CDATA[One of the biggest bugbears I have at the moment are pages that have a photo carousel. So not only have you got the bloat of jQuery to worry about, you&#039;ve then got several large photos to download, usually at high quality, which is a major headache when you&#039;re on a slow connection or a slow computer.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest bugbears I have at the moment are pages that have a photo carousel. So not only have you got the bloat of jQuery to worry about, you&#8217;ve then got several large photos to download, usually at high quality, which is a major headache when you&#8217;re on a slow connection or a slow computer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Craig Buckler</title><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/#comment-1064478</link> <dc:creator>Craig Buckler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:43:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=60685#comment-1064478</guid> <description><![CDATA[Adobe has abandoned mobile (well, they were forced to given that Flash was banned from iOS). But on the desktop, it remains a viable method of delivering adverts to most browsers.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe has abandoned mobile (well, they were forced to given that Flash was banned from iOS). But on the desktop, it remains a viable method of delivering adverts to most browsers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/#comment-1064447</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=60685#comment-1064447</guid> <description><![CDATA[Tackling the page weight issue is a constant struggle at our ecommerce company. Certainly images and promotional banners, etc account for a big chunk - which we can address easily enough with caching for repeat visitors. A bigger issue for us is the bloat in javascript : review data, analytics, remarketing, event tracking and live chat code.
Despite our best efforts, it&#039;s near impossible to get our pages below 500kb nowadays.
@TCertain - that site needs a lot of work.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tackling the page weight issue is a constant struggle at our ecommerce company. Certainly images and promotional banners, etc account for a big chunk &#8211; which we can address easily enough with caching for repeat visitors. A bigger issue for us is the bloat in javascript : review data, analytics, remarketing, event tracking and live chat code.</p><p>Despite our best efforts, it&#8217;s near impossible to get our pages below 500kb nowadays.</p><p>@TCertain &#8211; that site needs a lot of work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TCertain</title><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/web-page-weight-2012/#comment-1064437</link> <dc:creator>TCertain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:04:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/?p=60685#comment-1064437</guid> <description><![CDATA[The reason Flash is steady? Have you taken into consideration the fact that any android device now has no ability to run flash anymore? With the last 2 android updates, Adobe has so kindly decided that we no longer need Flash. So any site that has it, I don&#039;t get to see it. So I guess web developers have decided, I know I have, that there is no place for flash in any of my sites.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason Flash is steady? Have you taken into consideration the fact that any android device now has no ability to run flash anymore? With the last 2 android updates, Adobe has so kindly decided that we no longer need Flash. So any site that has it, I don&#8217;t get to see it. So I guess web developers have decided, I know I have, that there is no place for flash in any of my sites.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 37/48 queries in 0.039 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 524/533 objects using memcached

Served from: www.sitepoint.com @ 2013-05-13 17:52:08 --