Open Source Programmer’s Editor

Tweet

I recently received an email recommending I take a look at JEdit based on my coverage and recent commentary on open source at SitePoint. What a great tip that was!

I downloaded JEdit for my production machine (OS X notebook) and was pleasantly suprised with several features. I work on projects involving html/xhtml, Java, PHP and XML among others, and the syntax support is excellent (supports 90 file types). I have been hooked on BBEdit for years, however, JEdit may just knock that to the side.

Some features that jumped right out at me:

*Support for executing JavaDoc while in the JEdit interface and continuing to work on source code
*Ability to create Jar files within JEdit and also compile source files and packages
*XML plug-ins for validating xml against DTD’s and transforming xml files via XSLT
*Ability to connect and query SQL servers within the JEdit interface
*The ability to browse and edit files via FTP on a remote server

Built on Java 2, the editor works on Linux and variants, OS X and Windows. It utilizes the Java 1.4 platform and for those daredevils already running the Java 1.5 beta, it supports you too!

Get your free chapter of Level Up Your Web Apps with Go

Get a free chapter of Level Up Your Web Apps with Go, plus updates and exclusive offers from SitePoint.

  • sylozof

    And do not forget the dozens of plugins available…

  • Pete Prodoehl

    A BBEdit user, eh? See: http://community.jedit.org/cgi-bin/TWiki/view/Main/SwitchingFromBBEdit

    And you definitely do have to go through the extensive plugin list, and pick the ones that will work for you. They really help make jEdit a great text editor.

  • Anonymous

    It’s even got a plugin for reading blogs (HeadlinsPlugin). :-)

  • http://boyohazard.net Octal

    I have been using JEdit for about a year myself, don’t know how I survived without it.

  • zjcboy

    what about SciTE? I think it’s great, although some bugs still exist

  • zjcboy

    well, fonts are really ugly on Windows, especiall for me (already used to the good-looking ClearType fonts by MS :(