Friendster: switch to PHP

Tweet

Via an anonymous tip off (OK Simon) – Friendster goes PHP, switching from JSP / Tomcat.

Apparently performance has visibly improved to end users.

Eventually Rasmus’s message of PHP as a Shared Nothing Architecture will sink in…

Free book: Jump Start HTML5 Basics

Grab a free copy of one our latest ebooks! Packed with hints and tips on HTML5's most powerful new features.

  • http://eqdkp.com/ tsigo

    Wow, it’s a lot faster. A lot.

  • http://www.rideontwo.com z0s0

    ahh nothing like seeing a PHP error on php.net ;-)

    http://talks.php.net/show/lt2004-lamp/1

  • andre

    could it be that their Java implementation was badly-engineered, that’s why its performance was substandard before?

  • Martin Hjort Eriksen

    This is a funny result. I am my self a PHP enthusiast, but i the journal “ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, Volume 31 Issue 3″ there was an article called “A performance comparison of dynamic Web technologies” where Perl, Java server technolgy (also tomcat) and Perl was benchmarked in a labratory environment. It was concluded that Serverside Java outpreformed PHP and Perl by a factor 8.

  • Dangermouse

    Well now Friendster have changed, im sure Microsoft will follow suite soon ;)

  • http://www.phpcomplete.com/ jasonlotito

    A testing environment is one thing. Production is another. If a developer moves from X to Y, and things speed up and improve because of it, no amount of tests is going to change the fact that moving from X to Y speed thigns up.

  • http://gosu.pl cagrET

    http://talks.php.net/show/lt2004-lamp/7

    > No $_COOKIE for you

    What does it mean ?

  • NativeMind

    I believe it means that $_SESSION is much faster than $_COOKIE

  • http://diarist.com marcel

    Clickz.com used to run on Tomcat and JSP at some point. They also turned to PHP a year or so ago. In fact the whole Internet.com network runs most of it’s content on PHP

    Marcel
    http://computingdiary.com

  • Perrin Harkins

    Martin Ericksen needs to actually read that ACM article if he’s going to attempt to quote from it. It does NOT say that Java outperforms PHP and Perl by a factor of 8. What it does say is that using any kind of dynamic generation is up to 8 times slower than static pages. This should surprise no one.

  • http://www.pointbeing.net/ pointbeing

    Yahoo, Internet.com, now Friendster. I’m not surprised – in my previous work at a web agency, about two thirds of our business came from companies moving to Open Source, away from ASP and Java. About 30% was from one company alone – a major European auto manufacturer who were thoroughly disappointed with their JSP solution.

    The only question left is, how long before Amazon migrate? ;)

  • http://www.boredcow.com GeorgeB.

    All in all, if they’re happy, and their site runs faster, it was a good decision.

    Q – http://www.halofans.com

  • anon

    could it be because of a reconsilidating stand point? Where php developers are cheaper than J2EE / .NET devs?