SitePoint.com

dekuro · Jan 5, 2001, 11:56

http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/special/raum/4605/1.html

hi, this is the url I found on a german technology-site Telepolis. The article is in german, sorry, but maybe the one or the other is able to read it

It's about the landing on the moon in the year 1969 with armstrong. Critics say, that all was a fake and the photos are actually not possible because of the enormous temperature change of 160 degree at daytime and -40 degree in the night. The negatives should have been damaged.

The harsh light of the sun would not allow such a smooth grayscale and either the sight is absolute dark or complete light. So logically the pictures must look as they were not developed properly. A photo from the astronaut let us indicate that there were actually THREE men but as we know, only two went on the surface and the third was circling the orbit. NASA also react very suspiciously and destroyed all plans of saturn 5 etc.

stuff like that.. but very interesting. There's a sentence which I want to try to translate into english:

Die Geschichte der Mondlandung stimmt, wie man sieht, hinten und vorne nicht. Sie basiert auf der Leichtgläubigkeit unkritischer Zeitgenossen.

english:

The history of the moon-landing, as we see, is false from the beginning to the end. It is based on the gullibility of uncritical contemporary people.

sorry, if it's bad english.. just want to bring over this source

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Jan 5, 2001, 11:56	#1
dekuro Almeaty Member Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Nowhere Posts: 293	http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/special/raum/4605/1.html hi, this is the url I found on a german technology-site Telepolis. The article is in german, sorry, but maybe the one or the other is able to read it It's about the landing on the moon in the year 1969 with armstrong. Critics say, that all was a fake and the photos are actually not possible because of the enormous temperature change of 160 degree at daytime and -40 degree in the night. The negatives should have been damaged. The harsh light of the sun would not allow such a smooth grayscale and either the sight is absolute dark or complete light. So logically the pictures must look as they were not developed properly. A photo from the astronaut let us indicate that there were actually THREE men but as we know, only two went on the surface and the third was circling the orbit. NASA also react very suspiciously and destroyed all plans of saturn 5 etc. stuff like that.. but very interesting. There's a sentence which I want to try to translate into english: Die Geschichte der Mondlandung stimmt, wie man sieht, hinten und vorne nicht. Sie basiert auf der Leichtgläubigkeit unkritischer Zeitgenossen. english: The history of the moon-landing, as we see, is false from the beginning to the end. It is based on the gullibility of uncritical contemporary people. sorry, if it's bad english.. just want to bring over this source