| SitePoint Sponsor |
Heres what its supposed to look like, (with-out doctype added)
http://andrewj.no-ip.com/beta/
heres the sample including the doctype
http://andrewj.no-ip.com/beta/index_with_doctype.html
i've validated it (with the doctype)
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...sp=1&verbose=1
and validated the css
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/v...1&profile=css2
i've just never seen such an adverse effect of adding a doctype in?
It's a well known problem (but admittedly not one I've suffered from myself):Originally Posted by Andrew-J2000
http://www.alistapart.com/stories/doctype/index.html
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/java...8/doctype.html
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ppk/js/doctypes.html
MarcusJT
- former ASP web developer / former SPF "ASP Guru"
- *very* old blog with some useful ASP code
- Please think, Google, and search these forums before posting!
my doctype
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
listaparts proposed doctype
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
I dont see any difference, do you?
Is it not possible that it's actually displaying correctly, but you (accidentally) developed your site (and the CSS) to work only in quirks mode, and so once the browsers are switched to the right mode, the site looks wrong?
MarcusJT
- former ASP web developer / former SPF "ASP Guru"
- *very* old blog with some useful ASP code
- Please think, Google, and search these forums before posting!
hmmm, i'm not sure(even though pissed right now...) can you see anything wrong?
This is not the layout I propose, but it seems as though it should at least work...
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks