SitePoint Sponsor

User Tag List

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    om nom nom nom Stomme poes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    10,233
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Headings: Who Needs 'em? (post by Roger Hudson)

    http://usability.com.au/2013/01/headings-who-needs-em/

    Quote Originally Posted by article
    This is a story about web page headings and sub-headings: A story that tries to look beyond the absurd distinctions that are sometimes made about the usability and accessibility of web content, to ask who needs headings and why.

    Imagine, if you will, a web page containing a 5,000 word article; a large slab of text with many sentences and paragraphs. Most, if not all, people will find this article easier to read if it is broken up into sections, each identified with an appropriate heading or sub-heading, and for people with disabilities it can be especially important. This is the starting point for our discussion of web content usability and accessibility.
    The main point of the article, though, seems to be that sometimes the WCAG2 level requirements (A, AA, AAA) are a bit strange. He gives an example of what's needed to conform to level AAA with headings, and then for just A (the lowest). For example, breaking up a 5000-word essay with properly marked-up headings with unrelated words (such as <h1>jibber-jabber</h1> and <h2>heading!</h2>) will count as satisfying level A conformance. It's only up at level AA that the headings actually have to have meaning. That is lawlz.

    But anyway, a fun read. Enjoy.

  2. #2
    Mouse catcher silver trophy
    Stevie D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Yorkshire, UK
    Posts
    5,820
    Mentioned
    110 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Hmmm ... I'm really struggling to see what Roger's point is here. It could go one of two ways:
    1 - making up headings properly is just so darned easy that there is no excuse for anyone not to get AA
    2 - the WCAG specs are badly written.

    Personally, I think that as far as headings go, there really ought to just be one standard, which is required to get an A but is also sufficient to get AAA. It's just so basic that it's hard to see how the correct use of heading tags could be sensibly split into three levels of pass. Instead we get lots of incomprehensible guff about 'programatically determined', which doesn't make any sense whatsoever. So much for the accessibility standards being accessible... :sigh:


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •