And at the end of the article I was reading, it said:
"Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed."
What's bugging me is, considering that you are not allowed to rewrite, or even redistribute, how come sites like digg aren't neck deep in lawsuits?
I would think Digg's model (and that of similar sites like reddit) falls under "redistribution".