Results 1 to 1 of 1
Thread: IndexedDB versioning question
Apr 18, 2012, 19:57 #1
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- West Springfield, Massachusetts
- 146 Post(s)
- 1 Thread(s)
IndexedDB versioning question
I've been playing with IndexedDB a bit and have noticed under "onupgradeneeded" (W3C draft) that the version datatype is an unsigned long.
Maybe I have blinders on, but I'm used to versioning like
[major revision] dot [minor revision] dot [tweak revision]
So I'm wondering why an unsigned long? Is this needed for a versioning convention I'm unaware of? Negative versions?
I'm also wondering how the API deals with 2 decimals, doesn't seem like a long would do it.
I guess I'd better leave off the "tweak" revisions until I know better.