SitePoint Sponsor

User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    <title class="lol"> bronze trophy TehYoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northeast Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    806
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    What does Fireworks give me that Photoshop doesn't?

    They say that Adobe Fireworks is "optimized for the web"...but I can make graphics much more easily or just as easily in Photoshop as in Fireworks...can someone who works w/ Fireworks tell me what (if anything) I'm missing?

    Thanks.
    ~TehYoyo

  2. #2
    Community Advisor silver trophybronze trophy
    dresden_phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    2,742
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    EASY WAY to make animated GIFs inan OPTIMIZED and LOGICAL fashion.
    More control over PNG transparency and optimization.
    Am not certain if the SAVE FOR WEB algorithm is differing in FW and PS but I wouldn't be surprised if it is.
    It also feels to me as if the drawing tools handle in a more specialized way.

  3. #3
    <title class="lol"> bronze trophy TehYoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northeast Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    806
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I'm really asking this because I'm on a budget...do I drop the (is it $400?) cash for Fireworks for small advantages? Are the advantages small?

    ~TehYoyo

  4. #4
    Community Advisor silver trophybronze trophy
    dresden_phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    2,742
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Honestly. It's the pilot not the plane. I hardly ever use it, BUT it saves me TONS of times when I do. DO NOTE: There are dozens of shareware apps ($10-25) out there that do 1 or 2 things that FW does so that's an alternative. The most important thing to take into account is: if you are learning and growing, start at with basics., such as PS-- THEN expand as needed.

  5. #5
    <title class="lol"> bronze trophy TehYoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northeast Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    806
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Yeah. I think that that's what I'll do. Thanks a lot.

    ~TehYoyo

  6. #6
    Non-Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Photoshop has caught up to Fireworks in terms of animation and GIFs. I don't see anything on the market that can do graphics like Photoshop especially with the new beta CS6 release.

  7. #7
    <title class="lol"> bronze trophy TehYoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northeast Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    806
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I didn't think that the beta release was super groundbreaking...most releases are just a few upgrades and some features from other programs brought into the others. I tried to make a gif and it kept turning out bad (in PS). But maybe I was doing it wrong...

    ~TehYoyo

  8. #8
    Mazel tov! bronze trophy kohoutek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Posts
    4,248
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Fireworks is good if you don't already have a vector program as it does vector, something Photoshop can't do. Another strong point for Fireworks is in how it allows you to save images for the web, .png format in particular, something Photoshop is completely incapable of doing well at all.

    With PS only, you'll additionally need a good image compression tool.
    Maleika E. A. | Rockatee | Twitter | Dribbble



  9. #9
    <title class="lol"> bronze trophy TehYoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northeast Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    806
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    How much compression is the difference? If I make a .png image in PS that's, say, 30kb, how much of a difference is it? What about a 200kb image (not that I would normally make an image that large)?

    I'm learning Illustrator at the moment.

    ~TehYoyo

  10. #10
    Mazel tov! bronze trophy kohoutek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Posts
    4,248
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Depends on the type of image and how many colors and effects you have. The good thing with FW is that you can actually delete color by color to make the file smaller. Even without going that far, I've been able to reduce file sizes up to 90%.

    See this article for some info.
    Maleika E. A. | Rockatee | Twitter | Dribbble



  11. #11
    <title class="lol"> bronze trophy TehYoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northeast Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    806
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kohoutek View Post
    Depends on the type of image and how many colors and effects you have. The good thing with FW is that you can actually delete color by color to make the file smaller. Even without going that far, I've been able to reduce file sizes up to 90%.

    See this article for some info.
    Wow. Those are some significant file size changes. But even so, does it offer more than just a great image compression technique? Or is it worth the cost?

    ~TehYoyo

  12. #12
    Mazel tov! bronze trophy kohoutek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Posts
    4,248
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TehYoyo View Post
    Wow. Those are some significant file size changes. But even so, does it offer more than just a great image compression technique? Or is it worth the cost?

    ~TehYoyo
    This largely depends on what you're planning to do. If you plan on doing a lot of vector work, then I'd say it's a tool you should consider. There is, of course, Illustrator which is slightly more advanced for vector work, but it doesn't have the good file compression options.

    And then there are other, cheaper alternatives, so I'd say, download the trial version of the various tools and see which one you find to be the most intuitive.

    If you just need to do the occasional raster graphics and already have Photoshop, then you don't need it.

    I'd not buy Fireworks just for its good PNG compression abilities. For that there might be tools that probably do the job just as well, e.g. like the tools in the article I posted or using PHP's GD Library.
    Maleika E. A. | Rockatee | Twitter | Dribbble



  13. #13
    <title class="lol"> bronze trophy TehYoyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northeast Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    806
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Alright, sure. I might have enough cash to get FW b/c I found out I can use a student license for commercial work, so I might upgrade my MC.

    Thanks.
    ~TehYoyo

    Edit: I'm at school atm, so I tried out FW w/ their edition of CS5. I did the same experiment as the article linked to. My results:

    I tried making the highest file I could - I started w/ a standard 600 x 600 px canvas, applied rainbow gradients w/ different transparency stops in the image. Saved from Photoshop. Next, I followed the steps described and saved it from Fireworks. Saved from Fireworks. The result? The second image (33kb) was 7% of the first image (458kb)! Although this is astounding, you can clearly see the lack of quality in the second one. So I tried it w/ a photo, a more realistic idea of what I would be using on a website. The first image was 87kb, the second 30.8KB.

    Thoughts?


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •