SitePoint Sponsor

User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    SitePoint Zealot ComposerRyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    A longer .com domain name or shorter .tv domain name? Which is better?

    Hi, I am currently running BestofVideoGames.com but we have changed our domain name to BOVG.tv and I am wondering: did I make a mistake? "BestofVideoGames" is 16 letters but has the .com extension....however, the "BOVG" is only 4 letters but on the other hand uses the .tv extension.

    Which one do you think is better? And, yes, we are considered a TV-style show, so .tv makes sense for us but I am wondering:

    1) Is it too difficult to remember?

    2) Is the .com better anyways, even though it is longer?

    Thanks for the help!

    Ryan

  2. #2
    Non-Member MyDomAinZ.us's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Fort Bregg, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    798
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    we liked the shorter one.

  3. #3
    . shoooo... silver trophy logic_earth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    9,013
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Neither is better. It is all about marketing and branding not your domain name. Market one or the other. And have the other redirect to the primary.
    Logic without the fatal effects.
    All code snippets are licensed under WTFPL.


  4. #4
    SitePoint Member snoopy63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was going to say the same as the second poster, don't let the dot com go, have it redirect to the .tv Best of luck to you

  5. #5
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by logic_earth View Post
    Neither is better. It is all about marketing and branding not your domain name. Market one or the other. And have the other redirect to the primary.
    Another who agrees with that statement here. Take them both and pick one to market.

  6. #6
    SitePoint Zealot ComposerRyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks everyone for the advice. Apparently, I feel I am on the right track after hearing your advice because we are currently doing just that...redirecting the long .com to the short .tv which is working out well. I prefer the short .tv domain name: it's easy to remember for most people and each letter stands for our name too. Any other advice would be greatly appreciated! Thanks again.

  7. #7
    Programming Since 1978 silver trophybronze trophy felgall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    16,869
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I'd redirect the shorter name to the long one since the long one is actually more descriptive. Also whatever SEO effect that the domain name will have is going to come from the long name not the short one and so that's the one you want the search engines to see.
    Stephen J Chapman

    javascriptexample.net, Book Reviews, follow me on Twitter
    HTML Help, CSS Help, JavaScript Help, PHP/mySQL Help, blog
    <input name="html5" type="text" required pattern="^$">

  8. #8
    SitePoint Zealot
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    150
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I prefer the shorter one. However, I'll agree to felgall that redirect the shorter name to the longer one as the longer one is more descriptive. Keep both domains for yourselves, and use one as a parked domain.
    Exabytes Network - The Hosting Provider since 2001
    Business Hosting Plan - Check out the lowest offer ever
    Dedicated Server - Free 25GB CDN for any sign-up

  9. #9
    Community Advisor silver trophy

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,559
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Have you analysed where most of your traffic comes from? If it comes from search terms relating to 'best video games' then you're likely best to stick with the longer one. The short url would make a good url shortener for social media use e.g similar to bit.ly

  10. #10
    SitePoint Zealot MrFlicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Bucks Herts London Lincs< UK
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ComposerRyan View Post
    Hi, I am currently running BestofVideoGames.com but we have changed our domain name to BOVG.tv and I am wondering: did I make a mistake? "BestofVideoGames" is 16 letters but has the .com extension....however, the "BOVG" is only 4 letters but on the other hand uses the .tv extension.

    Which one do you think is better? And, yes, we are considered a TV-style show, so .tv makes sense for us but I am wondering:

    1) Is it too difficult to remember?

    2) Is the .com better anyways, even though it is longer?

    Thanks for the help!

    Ryan
    When people are searching for BOVG (EG when it has brand recognition)

    Then it will be better

    That's my first thought

    until then - well you know.....

  11. #11
    Programming Since 1978 silver trophybronze trophy felgall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    16,869
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    As long as one redirects to the other people will be able to access the site using either one. The only difference will be that search engines will only see the one the site is actually on and not the one that is redirecting.
    Stephen J Chapman

    javascriptexample.net, Book Reviews, follow me on Twitter
    HTML Help, CSS Help, JavaScript Help, PHP/mySQL Help, blog
    <input name="html5" type="text" required pattern="^$">

  12. #12
    SitePoint Zealot MrFlicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Bucks Herts London Lincs< UK
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    site being the operative word there felgall as you said domain

    somewhat misleading and why it just sounds like a contradiction within three sentences

    One minute it can't see it the next it is marking it as duplicate - that made no sense.

    though I can't really make much sense of your last sentence either but that might be as it's bed time as it still sounds like you are saying the SE's can't see it as it has no content/site on it's domain.

  13. #13
    Programming Since 1978 silver trophybronze trophy felgall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    16,869
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I'll try to make it clearer then.

    As far as people reaching the site by entering one of the domain names it makes no difference which directs to which as both end up at the same place.

    Where actual links only use the domain that the site is actually on those links go straight to the site as well.

    The only time links would ever go to the domain that is redirected is if you changed which domain the site is on. The redirect is basically an instruction to say that the site used to be at that address but has now moved (301 means permanently moved) to the new domain. The domain being redirected should therefore be ignored as the address has changed. Ignoring the address being redirected is what 301 means. If you don't want it ignored you'd use 302 which indicates that the move is only temporary and the address will be changed back later.

    So why would you expect the search engines to disregard a clear instruction "301 - ignore this address as it has been premanently changed"?

    That being the case, you want the most descriptive of the names as the one that doesn't have the ignore/redirect associated with it.

    Of course the search engines can "see" both domains - the difference is that one has an ignore/redirect command attached to it and the other doesn't. So the search engine does what it has been told to do and redirects to the replacement address.
    Stephen J Chapman

    javascriptexample.net, Book Reviews, follow me on Twitter
    HTML Help, CSS Help, JavaScript Help, PHP/mySQL Help, blog
    <input name="html5" type="text" required pattern="^$">

  14. #14
    SitePoint Member jerxe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    shorter is much better because it's easier to remember, there is no rule to be .com it can be .net, .org, .biz, .info etc.

  15. #15
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In my opinion .com perform well and didn't confuse user even if it is long...

  16. #16
    SitePoint Enthusiast pankajs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    .tv is for the websites that are based on television videos and forecast.
    .com version of your domain name is not impressive or good enough..
    But .com would be better then .tv because your website is a blog cum forum.

  17. #17
    SitePoint Zealot ComposerRyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks again everyone for your suggestions. I am still trying to figure out what I want to do. I have noticed google does not show .tv domain names at all. What do you think about www.BOVGTV.com It is only six letters, but I think it is very hard to remember. I think BOVG.tv is easier, but at the same time it is a .tv extension which doesn't seem to be hardly recognized by google...


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •