SitePoint Sponsor

User Tag List

Page 1 of 14 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 456

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    SitePoint Wizard ShayneTilley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,044
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    I'm not sure if i'm allowed to share this - but it made me gasp

    Piracy for a while was an internal conflict to me. The idea of sharing things like music, whilst wrong, was just so much as social norm, it didn't feel wrong. That all changed for me when I started at SitePoint and saw things from the producers perspective. Then I co-wrote my own book at it became much much more real for me. I've never tried to hide the fact that our books are scattered all over file sharing networks, nor was I ever happy about the DRM entanglements we had on our electronic products (long gone now), but I was a little shocked when I got this.

    We've be trialling PiracyGuards, to monitor our products on common piracy networks. We got our first report today and nearly 500 take down notices had been issued. I knew that our books were out there, but this shook me up a little.

    I'm interested to hear you're own thoughts on piracy, doesn't matter if it's from a consumer or a producers perspective.

    The reality is that more people pirate our books than buy them, I don't know to what ratio -- I probably don't want to know. And many many people have always claimed, the more that's pirated the more that sells, but I'm still not sure how to take that. Love to hear your input.
    Shayne Tilley

    My slightly left of center thoughts on
    marketing, business and life in general.

  2. #2
    Programming Since 1978 silver trophybronze trophy felgall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    16,862
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    When people take copies of something that you spent time producing as your job rather than paying you for it then you either starve or go find some other less interesting work and hope you get paid for doing that.

    From the other side, if something you want is not available through a legitimate source at a reasonable price but is available from a pirate then you have a choice between obtaining it from the pirate or not getting it at all.
    Stephen J Chapman

    javascriptexample.net, Book Reviews, follow me on Twitter
    HTML Help, CSS Help, JavaScript Help, PHP/mySQL Help, blog
    <input name="html5" type="text" required pattern="^$">

  3. #3
    I Love Licorice silver trophybronze trophy Datura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Florida USA
    Posts
    5,774
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It really is a simple moral issue: either you are accepting theft as your right or you are rejecting it. It is astounding to me how many people take things without any thought of the source or the right of the owner to get paid for what he has created/produced.

    Technical inventions have made theft much easier today, so a strong moral character is required to resist the temptation to just take. Compounding the problem of taking is that the underpinnings of what is taught is that it is alright to force people to "share", as if it is an obligation of the person who has something to give it to the person who does not.
    Ulrike
    TUTs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

  4. #4
    #titanic {float:none} silver trophy
    molona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    from Madrid to Heaven
    Posts
    8,259
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Well, this is the type of topic where Datura and I always disagree

    I understand both parts and it is not always easy, although it may look like it.

    First, it is the creator/editor or whoever who has the right to sell the book/album/art or whatever at the price they choose and to whoever they choose. People getting illegal copies may hurt the system by lowering the profits of the writer/company etc and that's wrong. I said may. Not everybody that downloads illegal copies would become a customer anyway. As a matter of fact, many of them will not.

    Having said that, I would say that there are many reasons to get an illegal copy and that's why I not consider it as a theft all the time.

    - It is not the same if the company or person still has big profits with that product. Madonna, as an example, is as rich as she can get. Careful, it is still wrong, but it is not the same to take it from someone that really and desparately needs it that from someone that doesn't.

    - Some people simply can't afford it (no matter how cheap) but still need it. Else, he may not be able to learn a skill and improve in his/her job and therefore get a better salary.

    - You may afford to buy one or two, but not all that you need... how many books about SQL you read till you find a really good book?

    - The product may be overpriced... A playstation game cost around 60 € here... the game may be worth it (the sad thing is that sometimes the game is not that good) but... at 60 € per game... how many do you think that you can afford?

    - There's simply no way to get it (or sometimes there's no other way to get it on time) no matter how hard you try. This happened to me with some songs. They are so old that you can't find them on the stores anymore. It also happened to me with some software, so I was forced to download an illegal copy till I waited for the legal to come.

    - It is availabe, and then you get it because it looks interesting and you may want to check it further... if it wasn't available, I would never buy it because you really don't care about it. In this case, there's no loss because I wouldn't have bought it anyway. This happens more times than people think.

    The other thing to keep into account is that a particular person downloaded or got an illegal copy and then liked it so much that (s)he becomes a fan. Most of the time, that person will get a legal copy just to have the original thing or do something that will provide profit (such as downloading music, you like the group and then you buy the merchandise and/or go to the concert).

    These indirect profits most of the time are not counted by the companies and how piracy affects them. But as a matter of fact, it also happens very often

  5. #5
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    Posts
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It is not the same if the company or person still has big profits with that product. Madonna, as an example, is as rich as she can get. Careful, it is still wrong, but it is not the same to take it from someone that really and desparately needs it that from someone that doesn't.
    I can think of a lot of reasons that people excuse piracy, but this one just justifies robbing from the rich.

    I wrote a book, and my boss stole it from me after he told me the company wasn't going to use it. I found out that HE SOLD IT for 5 years without my knowledge. When I started to sue him for copyright infringement, I was told by several people that he used the money to play "secret Santa" for poor families. Well, it's great that he was so generous with MY MONEY, but in this case he decided for me that I didn't need the money.

    Bottom line -- we should be honest and let people decide what they do with their own profits.
    Last edited by molona; Apr 29, 2010 at 20:26.

  6. #6
    #titanic {float:none} silver trophy
    molona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    from Madrid to Heaven
    Posts
    8,259
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by randyman5775 View Post
    I can think of a lot of reasons that people excuse piracy, but this one just justifies robbing from the rich.
    Again, first you need to prove that Madonna has lost anything. It is still her song, it is still her music and recognised as such and she stills has her original. The only thing should could have lost is the cash that person didn't pay.. and yet that's still need to be proved.

    But let's say that this person stopped buying the song because he got it for free (case in which Madonna does lose something) and even worse, that this guy sells it to someone else making profit. Definately, it is wrong and the guy is a thief but certainly Madonna's life style is not hurt in the same way that you'd be hurt. That's not a excuse, it is a fact unless it happened to you and you could afford the life style Madonna has.
    Quote Originally Posted by randyman5775 View Post
    I wrote a book, and my boss stole it from me after he told me the company wasn't going to use it. I found out that HE SOLD IT for 5 years without my knowledge. When I started to sue him for copyright infringement, I was told by several people that he used the money to play "secret Santa" for poor families. Well, it's great that he was so generous with MY MONEY, but in this case he decided for me that I didn't need the money.

    Bottom line -- we should be honest and let people decide what they do with their own profits.
    Fair enough. But you don't sound upset because he used the book but because he made a profit and used it the way he thought correct. I don't hear your crying because you work was used but for the money you did lose.

  7. #7
    King of Paralysis by Analysis bronze trophy
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    5,840
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by molona View Post
    Definately, it is wrong and the guy is a thief but certainly Madonna's life style is not hurt in the same way that you'd be hurt.
    In other words, it's OK to steal from the rich because they are rich.

    That's a slippery slope at best, is it OK for a street person to steal from a lower class person because they are richer than them? Is it ok for a lower class person to steal from a middle class person because they are richer than them?

    Is it OK for Nigerian scammers to steal from middle class US seniors because they are richer than them?

  8. #8
    #titanic {float:none} silver trophy
    molona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    from Madrid to Heaven
    Posts
    8,259
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Definately, it is wrong and the guy is a thief but certainly Madonna's life style is not hurt in the same way that you'd be hurt.
    Quote Originally Posted by tke71709 View Post
    In other words, it's OK to steal from the rich because they are rich.
    I would suggest to re-read the sentence and not to change the words and not to apply to them a conclusion that can't be extracted from them. This will help to get us all understood and not to put words into someone else's mouth that (s)he didn't say. Thank you

  9. #9
    Error 404: Life not found silver trophybronze trophy
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    UK Nr Manchester
    Posts
    3,460
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ShayneTilley View Post
    The reality is that more people pirate our books than buy them, I don't know to what ratio -- I probably don't want to know. And many many people have always claimed, the more that's pirated the more that sells, but I'm still not sure how to take that. Love to hear your input.
    Perhaps the best approach is to assume that your work is going to be pirated and figure out the best way to monitise that situation. Maybe use the books as a way to drive traffic to a paid subscription model, the more books you actually sell the better but see the whole thing as a marketing effort rather than a dedicated income stream. People actually consider your books worth pirating, that's quite something, there's a viral element here that could be an opportunity for someone with the right know how.

    Maybe.... I've never had a massively selling product or had to monitise vast traffic numbers so I'm theorising off the top of my head here. Over to you!
    It's 530 people, but do you really get it?
    ImgWebDesign - Web design in Buxton, High Peak, Derbyshire UK.

  10. #10
    ✯✯✯ silver trophybronze trophy php_daemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5,284
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JJMcClure View Post
    Perhaps the best approach is to assume that your work is going to be pirated and figure out the best way to monitise that situation. Maybe use the books as a way to drive traffic to a paid subscription model, the more books you actually sell the better but see the whole thing as a marketing effort rather than a dedicated income stream. People actually consider your books worth pirating, that's quite something, there's a viral element here that could be an opportunity for someone with the right know how.

    Maybe.... I've never had a massively selling product or had to monitise vast traffic numbers so I'm theorising off the top of my head here. Over to you!
    Exactly my thoughts on this subject. You can't fight them - make them useful.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sagewing View Post
    Also, you used the tired old rationale that sometimes you have no choice but to steal software or music. Like in your example about the software wasn't available so you were 'forced to download an illegal copy till I waited for the legal to come.'. Were you really forced? Are you comparing yourself to a starving person who steals bread to feed their baby? Oh please
    Is advertising used on you to make you want to buy the product not a force? The psychological tricks widely used in advertising often border with questionable ethics and leaving a person in a mental torment by then not allowing them to buy is a mental force.

    That doesn't mean that you should respond to force with force unless it's absolutely vital, but that's a natural human reaction.

    I'm not trying to justify it, and I personally think it is wrong, but there is that side of the coin.

    The issue is more complicated than it might seem. In US, UK, some other countries most of these digital goods are as available legally as they are pirated (especially music). But the rest of the world is stuck with music stores and their limited availability overpriced stock. However, the advertising reaches the entire world over the Internet, traditional media and the same music and movies. You expect too much from humanity if you think they will resist that psychological pressure and not respond back with force.

    The only way to "fight it" is to make it as available as possible to everyone around the world. And make the rest work for you.
    Saul

  11. #11
    Twitter: @AnthonySterling silver trophy AnthonySterling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North-East, UK.
    Posts
    6,111
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm sure I'm not unique, but I just can't read electronic copies of books. More so for technical/programming books, I like to take some time *away* from a computer and be inspired.

    With this said, I do downloaded illegal copies of books.

    If I find a book I find interesting, I read the reviews on Amazon, decide whether or not the price is something I can afford. If so, download it (if available) from the usual places then after a brief skim and a chapter or two, if I find the book engaging, I purchase a hard-copy of it.

    Personally, I find this acceptable and see it no different to movies trailers or flicking through the book at the bookstore.
    @AnthonySterling: I'm a PHP developer, a consultant for oopnorth.com and the organiser of @phpne, a PHP User Group covering the North-East of England.

  12. #12
    SitePoint Wizard bronze trophy bluedreamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Middle England
    Posts
    3,397
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Back in the day, soon after personal computing went "mainstream" (1990's), I remember going to computer fairs and seeing traders with 100's of CD's for sale - software, music, everything. One think that's always stayed with me was seeing a CD with the complete works of Pink Floyd on it. At the time many of us were still buying vinyl records so seeing that all in one CD was impressive - the fact that it was pirated never occurred to me and I could have owned every Pink Floyd song for just a few quid. After all, why spend 10x that when I can have it all for a fraction of the price?

    Skip forward a few years and the internet becomes mainstream. Eventually some programmers create a file sharing system and bang, before you know it people are sharing all sorts of stuff - but this time, instead of pirating Pink Floyd songs and selling them, theyre just giving it away for free. As time progressed just about anything that could be digitalised could be found on the file sharing networks and beyond.

    Half the problem is the fact that many people don't see any harm in partaking in sharing of copyrighted items. One girlfriend of mine, her daughter downloads movies like there's no tomorrow, her PC is always on downloading the latest movies and she has a massive archive of DVD's, none of which she's paid a penny for. I've often challenged her about it but her response is always the same "they make millions in profit, one download won't hurt". To make matters worse she's actually paid for access to this download site so in her eyes it's legitimate, despite all the content being pirated.

    People who are growing up in this digital age of freely available content are blissfully unaware of copyright or just take the attitude of "why should I pay if I can get it for free". That's a tough nut to crack!

    Then I have a musician friend who's produced a dozen albums and used to get by on the royalties. He's by no means rich so that income kept food on his table, but in recent years his roylaties have dwindled away to virtually nothing, all because people are pirating his lifes work. Is he annoyed - you bet! Heavy depression now rules his life. I've offered to help him get some of his songs on legitimate music sites but his attitude is still "why bother?".

    There will never be a way to stop piracy, that's a fact of life, but I think that if you publish something that can be digitalised you've got to accept that it will be pirated at some point. I believe the ball is now in the court of the publishers who have to find a way of minimising piracy, or turning it to their advantage. I don't know what the answer is but there's a solution for every problem, all we need is "the one" to have a lightbulb moment that will level the playing field.

  13. #13
    #titanic {float:none} silver trophy
    molona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    from Madrid to Heaven
    Posts
    8,259
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bluedreamer View Post
    her daughter downloads movies like there's no tomorrow, her PC is always on downloading the latest movies and she has a massive archive of DVD's, none of which she's paid a penny for
    Would you call her a thief? or brainless and selfish?

    Quote Originally Posted by bluedreamer View Post
    Then I have a musician friend who's produced a dozen albums and used to get by on the royalties. He's by no means rich so that income kept food on his table, but in recent years his roylaties have dwindled away to virtually nothing, all because people are pirating his lifes work. Is he annoyed - you bet! Heavy depression now rules his life. I've offered to help him get some of his songs on legitimate music sites but his attitude is still "why bother?".
    Your friend has decided to do nothing but he could take advantage of the situations and promote himself and get new jobs... maybe a web where he could take requests to create little personalised songs for birthdays and special occassions... maybe he could play at the local bar as the famous guy in town and get a percetage of the sales... Other musicians have adapted and they do quite well and now they don't want to change back. He may want to diversify. True, it is not easy but it can be done and it is better than stay and cry for what has been lost.

  14. #14
    SitePoint Wizard bronze trophy bluedreamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Middle England
    Posts
    3,397
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by molona View Post
    Would you call her a thief? or brainless and selfish?
    Hmmm, probably selfish, but technically a thief as well. She knows what she does is morally wrong but she doesn't care!

    Quote Originally Posted by molona View Post
    Your friend has decided to do nothing but he could take advantage of the situations and promote himself and get new jobs... maybe a web where he could take requests to create little personalised songs for birthdays and special occassions... maybe he could play at the local bar as the famous guy in town and get a percetage of the sales... Other musicians have adapted and they do quite well and now they don't want to change back. He may want to diversify. True, it is not easy but it can be done and it is better than stay and cry for what has been lost.
    Good ideas, but it's a bit more complex than that. His band tours mainly around North/South America and Europe and they do already play regularly in his local town. However, income from gigs is relatively small when you take the costs away and their main "profit" comes from sales of CD/DVD's which of course are the very things that are being pirated!

  15. #15
    ✯✯✯ silver trophybronze trophy php_daemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5,284
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bluedreamer View Post
    their main "profit" comes from sales of CD/DVD's which of course are the very things that are being pirated!
    I can definitely see how that is a big problem. Who wants to buy music CD/DVDs nowadays anyway? Only die hard fans. The technology allows us to buy music online and people want to get it online. So they will find a way. And unless there's an easy way to do it legally, they will do it illegally.

    The only option for your friend to fight it is to make their music available to buy online, and make that the main profit stream. And try to use the pirated music to their advantage, heck maybe even release those that are already pirated for free and get even more fans that way. There's a whole possible line of other products that fans would buy - t-shirts, collectibles, premium CD/DVD, etc. There are, indeed, musicians who already do it very successfully.

    Just speculating here, and that is of course easier said than done, but the only other option is to keep relying on CD sales and eventually go out of business, I'm afraid
    Saul

  16. #16
    SitePoint Wizard bronze trophy bluedreamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Middle England
    Posts
    3,397
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by php_daemon View Post
    The only option for your friend to fight it is to make their music available to buy online, and make that the main profit stream...
    Believe me I've offered many times to help him go digital but he still won't bite. Part of the problem is that much of the material is technically controlled by record labels and we all know how backwards they are still.

  17. #17
    #titanic {float:none} silver trophy
    molona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    from Madrid to Heaven
    Posts
    8,259
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bluedreamer View Post
    Hmmm, probably selfish, but technically a thief as well. She knows what she does is morally wrong but she doesn't care!
    That's where I don't agree... She's young and careless as most people with that age (I'm assuming that she's a teenager or that she's in her early 20's). Hopefully, she will mature but I wouldn't say that she's a thief for that.
    In the same way, I wouldn't say it is her fault that the industry doesn't want things to change and evolve... but things do change and evolve, and the classic copyright scheme will most probably change. As computers run faster and storage is cheaper and there are new ways of distribution, the actual copyright scheme will be obsolete and worthless. And that's due to happen with people downloading or without people downloading.
    Quote Originally Posted by bluedreamer View Post
    Good ideas, but it's a bit more complex than that. His band tours mainly around North/South America and Europe and they do already play regularly in his local town. However, income from gigs is relatively small when you take the costs away and their main "profit" comes from sales of CD/DVD's which of course are the very things that are being pirated!
    Everything is complex, and most of of the time it isn't black or white. But if he does nothing and tries to keep the old ways, he may find himself in trouble. Although I hope that he reacts before that happens... after all, he's your friend
    He only has two choices: diversify or provide added value. He could take advantage of the new technologies too.

    Just a silly idea: setting up his own site and form his own fan club... and charge a monthly fee to those who want to have a little bit extra (it could be that they will have the copy of their songs before anyone, a master class through videoconference from time to time, some free tickets for the next concert near his living place).

    He really needs to sit and brainstorm ideas that may work to keep his income level. Technology will not wait for him and the longer he takes, the worst. There are other groups and singers that are doing this kind of stuff (at least in Spain) and do quite well... but the market may become saturated.


    Quote Originally Posted by php_daemon
    And unless there's an easy way to do it legally, they will do it illegally.
    Completely agree... Make it easy and they will buy Just a little correction... In Spain it is legal as long as I do it for personal use.

  18. #18
    SitePoint Wizard bronze trophy bluedreamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Middle England
    Posts
    3,397
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by molona View Post
    That's where I don't agree... She's young and careless as most people with that age. Hopefully, she will mature but I wouldn't say that she's a thief for that.
    We'll disagree on tht then

    Quote Originally Posted by molona View Post
    He only has two choices: diversify or provide added value. He could take advantage of the new technologies too.
    As posted above, I've offered my help many times. "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink"

    Still, JT (you know who) has just got her first album on iTunes!

  19. #19
    Life is short. Be happy today! silver trophybronze trophy Sagewing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Denver, Phang-Nga, Thailand
    Posts
    4,379
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Theft is theft, as long as we live under the rule of law.

    If you decide that Madonna has enough money, and want to institute a law that says that the government can decide who has enough money and redistribute the rest of their money accordingly, then you are getting into a political discussion about liberalism and wealth distribution. Regardless, as the laws stand now it's simply illegal to steal copyrighted material.

    Molona: I hear these rationalizations all the time, but almost always when it comes to digital media that are 'easy' to steal. But, if your logic is sound then we should also be able to apply it to non-digital, tangible assets.

    For example, if you are my neighbor and you are hungry and I have plenty of money, then you should be able to just take some food from me, without permission or even asking.

    If I have 2 cars and your only car is broken but you need to take your kid to school, then you have the right to enter my garage and simply take my car and use it.

    If I invent a cure for cancer and save the world, and make 10 million dollars doing it, you can decide that I 'have enough ' money and can distribute that money as you like or simply not pay for your cancer treatment.

    Also, you used the tired old rationale that sometimes you have no choice but to steal software or music. Like in your example about the software wasn't available so you were 'forced to download an illegal copy till I waited for the legal to come.'. Were you really forced? Are you comparing yourself to a starving person who steals bread to feed their baby? Oh please

    And your comment about overpricing also doesn't really make sense. If something that wasn't so easy to steal, like a fancy BMW cost $300,000 would you feel it was overpriced? Would you decide that you are morally correct in simply just taking it?

    I find that when something is just so easy to steal like music, movies, anything that can go around torrent, then suddenly everyone brings all of these convoluted rationalizations so that they dont' feel like they are 'stealing'.

    But, when it's something that's harder to steal or more plainly wrong, then suddenly they are moral again. If I am incredibly rich, will you steal my wallet? I have much more money!

    If you lost your car at a parking lot, will you steal mine cause you 'are forced to'?
    The fewer our wants, the nearer we resemble the gods. Socrates

    SAGEWING LLC - QUALITY WEB AND MOBILE APPS. PREMIUM OUTSOURCING SERVICES.
    Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Google+

  20. #20
    #titanic {float:none} silver trophy
    molona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    from Madrid to Heaven
    Posts
    8,259
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sagewing View Post
    For example, if you are my neighbor and you are hungry and I have plenty of money, then you should be able to just take some food from me, without permission or even asking.
    I'll take this one example although from the ones you mentioned since anyone will do. You're confusing things.

    1) If I download a book/song/movie/software... I am not invading your house or any place that belongs to you. That would be illegal.

    2) Are you telling me that, even if I did enter in your house and stole food, it would be the same if I did it because I'm hungry and I couldn't buy food that if I did it because simply I was in the mood of stealing?

    3) If I steal your food, take your car or whatever, you get no profit. But if I download you book, you may gain indirect profit. Don't compare the two things, please.

    4) Although they want to make it illegal, in Spain as per today it is legal so therefore I am not breaking any laws. Furthermore, I pay a tax on every mobile phone, hard drive, pen-drive or anything that may storage even the tiniest picture... and I pay for it it doesn't matter if I download it or if I don't

    5) We had this discusion in GC before although was more dedicated to the music industry and it was proved with numbers that while the industry lost money on one side, it earned much more on the other (such as concerts and merchandising)

    What I have said that not all the situations are the same. And now I say that not everybody is a thief but you put everyone on the same boat. Things are not that simple, I'm afraid.


    Quote Originally Posted by Sagewing View Post
    Like in your example about the software wasn't available so you were 'forced to download an illegal copy till I waited for the legal to come.'. Were you really forced? Are you comparing yourself to a starving person who steals bread to feed their baby? Oh please
    Well, yes, and with good reason! You're judging me here and I will not tolerate that. You don't know the details and I am not going to tell you. You will have to trust me when I tell you that I don't use words lightly. By all means, feel free to disagree with my opinion and say that what I did was wrong if you think that's the case. But don't judge me. I didn't feel 'forced', I felt forced. No quotes.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sagewing View Post
    And your comment about overpricing also doesn't really make sense. If something that wasn't so easy to steal, like a fancy BMW cost $300,000 would you feel it was overpriced? Would you decide that you are morally correct in simply just taking it?
    Have I said anything about morality at this point? Don't twist my words! There are also other differences:

    1) We're not talking about luxury products only made for a few selected people but products that are supposed to be bought by every John and Jane. Again, your example can't be applied.
    2)I've listed the reasons why people downloaded using P2P networks...

    I think that you need to read my post twice and more slowly, especially the beggining.

  21. #21
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Phrase "morally wrong" is being thrown out in this discussion and it doesn't belong here.
    You're assuming that you're moral verticals for buying things that shouldn't get charged in the first place.

    Capitalism is one of the worst systems human kind invented, and since we live in such system and in an era where world is governed by wealth in form of money - you cannot deem one a thief for taking something that holds knowledge.

    I never saw an entertainer starving to death because someone from Macedonia downloaded their album and listened to it.
    I never saw anyone from Sitepoint begging for money at the street or digging holes for living because someone from Romania downloaded their book over torrent.

    Sorry to say, but this discussion is really pointless. Your starting point, that theft = piracy is simply wrong. Piracy is a neccessity of modern age. There are many brilliant minds out there who cannot get the knowledge they seek for the "regular" way. It's one thing if someone breaks into your appartment and physically steals a book you wrote and completely another if a transcript of your book finds itself in electronic format ready for masses to read.

    What if I bought your book and gave it to my local library where hundreds of people could borrow it and read it? Are they thieves?

    What if I hear a catchy song and I reproduce it on my guitar and I sing it in my own free time? Am I a thief for being able to remember a song and replay it?

    It boils down to this: people who use pirated software want the same things that people who buy the software get. What you're doing is promoting segregation. I live in a 3rd world country, hence I do not deserve to obtain the knowledge you have laid out on a silver pladder because there are no means or resources for me to buy the media you're selling. Basically, I need to sit there in my stone age, wait for my country to evolve and in 10 years when the means become available - I can obtain the thing you held all these years. And you call that morally right.

    Morally right and wrong doesn't exist here I'm afraid, with so many injustices, wars and what not around - piracy is the least of mankinds' problems. And I'm really sad to see how many jumped the "piracy is the holocaust of the internet" train. With so much money involved in stopping piracy, much better things could have been made and achieved. Greed is your enemy, it's just sad to see so many educated people fall to it.

  22. #22
    Life is short. Be happy today! silver trophybronze trophy Sagewing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Denver, Phang-Nga, Thailand
    Posts
    4,379
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Molona I carefully read your posts and responses.

    It just seems to me like you are working very hard to rationalize theft. Without getting into any of the arguments, I just don't buy them and I think that theft is theft unless there are some extraordinary circumstances such as truly being forced or a desperate need.
    The fewer our wants, the nearer we resemble the gods. Socrates

    SAGEWING LLC - QUALITY WEB AND MOBILE APPS. PREMIUM OUTSOURCING SERVICES.
    Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Google+

  23. #23
    #titanic {float:none} silver trophy
    molona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    from Madrid to Heaven
    Posts
    8,259
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    @sagewing: Fair enough. I still think that you haven't read my first post properly because the very first thing I said was that an writer/artist/creator had the right to do whatever (s)he pleases with his work.

    But I insist that I simply listed the reasons why people downloaded copyrighted material.

    What I think it is obvious that the old system is getting obsolete and a new system will have to be created so artists can benefit from their work. It happened before and this is merely an evolution of the business model. But, of course, with the current business model, the big labels and the right management companies did benefit and they don't want to let go. Something that I can fully understand. It will only delay things but it will not change the fact that it will change and that they will not have such a big control over the artists.

    With books it may be slightly different because for a writer to be independent he doesn't only need to be a good writer but to know how to use the appropriate software to make it look good and be distributed in the appropriate formats. No many writers have that technical knowledge.

    I simply can't consider it theft in all the cases... I can't consider it a theft when you can benefit from it.
    Last edited by molona; Jan 16, 2011 at 08:42. Reason: spelling

  24. #24
    Life is short. Be happy today! silver trophybronze trophy Sagewing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Denver, Phang-Nga, Thailand
    Posts
    4,379
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by molona View Post
    I simply can't consider it theft in all the cases... I can't consider it a theft when you can benefit from it.
    You may not, but according to the law in most countries with modern intellectual property rules, it's theft. Whether someone benefits or not isn't really a concept of whether it's theft or not.
    The fewer our wants, the nearer we resemble the gods. Socrates

    SAGEWING LLC - QUALITY WEB AND MOBILE APPS. PREMIUM OUTSOURCING SERVICES.
    Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Google+

  25. #25
    SitePoint Wizard masm50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,508
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sagewing View Post
    ...according to the law in most countries with modern intellectual property rules, it's theft. Whether someone benefits or not isn't really a concept of whether it's theft or not.
    Well that's not quite true.

    Under UK law theft is (to paraphrase) dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it. ie - That person no longer has the use of the object.

    Downloading an unauthorised digital copy is in most cases a civil tort of copyright infringement (well in most cases if you aren't trying to profit off the piracy).

    These are pretty different no matter how much the various industries try to equate them. It was still piracy and copyright infringement when people 20 years ago used to make mixtapes for their friends/lovers (and the industry kicked up a fuss about taping killing music), but I don't think people really argued morally against it. Yes it is on a much smaller scale, and the effect on the industry was negligible if not positive, but if you are going to equate copyright infringement to theft - that should be in the same boat.

    Now I'm not trying to justify piracy, and the scale of it today is a major issue for all intellectual property industries - I do a lot of work with bands and record labels, and see first hand the damage being done to many of them - but downloading is not the same as theft.

    Unlike music, however, I see a deeper problem with piracy for book publishers and film studios as there is no way for them to make money from touring, licensing deals, etc. Once Kindles/Nooks/iPads/etc become commonplace the publishing industry will have some major problems as file sizes are so small and so are very easy to share. I personally can't see myself ditching hardcopy books anytime soon (I still buy my music on vinyl (which coincidentally tend to come with free and legal high quality mp3 downloads too these days which is great)), but as technology progresses on colour e-ink, portability and battery life I'm sure I will eventually.

    As of ways to take on the problem...

    I think some form of subscription option may work - where authors could release the code examples separately, or release each chapter weekly/monthly as soon as it is written. The pace at which technical or internet related books become relatively obsolete means that getting the information early is a scarcity that could be monetised.

    Private live workshops sold along with the books could also be another way to add value, as people could get priority answers to their questions related to the book or even on related topics from the expert in the field that has written the book.

    On a related note - how effective do you feel PiracyGuard has been for Sitepoint so far and what made you choose them over their competitors such as WebSheriff?


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •