SitePoint Sponsor

User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: XHTML Basic 1.1

  1. #1
    SitePoint Zealot
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    XHTML Basic 1.1

    With the increasing emphasis on designing Web pages specifically for Mobile/Small screen rendering it may be a good time to visit and peruse W3C XHTML Basic 1.1 (July 2008 Recommendation). Also, the W3C mobileOK Checker (Check a Web Page for mobile-friendliness) is worth a visit -- its use can be quite enlightening!

    JFP

  2. #2
    billycundiff{float:left;} silver trophybronze trophy RyanReese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Whiteford, Maryland, United States
    Posts
    13,722
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi

    Not a bad mobile checker. But I don't like how it takes points off if you don't have an XHTML Basic DTD. <_<

    Cheers.
    Always looking for web design/development work.
    http://www.CodeFundamentals.com

  3. #3
    bronze trophy
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,670
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    mobileOK guidelines are a bit weird.

    Mobiles support text/html (and often actually treat XHTML as if it were text/html), so you could well use HTML if you want.

    They ban usage of PNG despite most browsers supporting it fine.

    They don't ban usage of XML 1.1 despite most browsers not supporting it.

    Also, there's no need to limit the number of elements you can use, just make sure to use features in a way that degrades nicely in browsers that don't support the given feature.
    Simon Pieters

  4. #4
    In memoriam gold trophysilver trophybronze trophy Dan Schulz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Aurora, Illinois
    Posts
    15,476
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, they are weird, especially for the reasons you gave. Thanks, Simon.

  5. #5
    SitePoint Zealot
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zcorpan View Post
    mobileOK guidelines are a bit weird ..........
    You are being nicely charitable! I have found that my own Web pages render quite well in small screen rendering mode (FF and Opera) and on "real life" hand-held (Mobile) device screens. I have designed my pages with this in mind.


    "It is the quality and usefulness of the content and the ease of navigation through it that are of the greatest importance to most web page users"

    JFP
    Last edited by jamesicus; Jan 15, 2009 at 12:22. Reason: corrected spelling

  6. #6
    One website at a time mmj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    6,282
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    XHTML Basic was a nice idea in theory, but was a fail in my opinion. It can't be served to regular browsers (well, as least not Internet Explorer, for example), and unlike when XHTML Basic was first conceived, common tag-soup-HTML is now well supported on current generation mobile devices. XHTML Basic may do all right, though, if you're prepared to create different versions for different user agents, possible mixed in with a bit of XSLT on the server-side. As for me, I prefer going with the highest common subset, which is pretty much HTML4.
    [mmj] My magic jigsaw
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The Bit Depth Blog Twitter Contact me
    Neon Javascript Framework Jokes Android stuff


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •