SitePoint Sponsor

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33
  1. #1
    SitePoint Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Exclamation how do you host your RoR app?

    I'm curious as to the best way to host a RoR app. I've read shared hosting isn't all that great, what are the other options and what have you chosen? Semi Dedicated, Dedicated, VPS, etc? I'm expecting something in the neighborhood of less than 250 unique visitors a day. If you have a live example, post the URL too please. I'm always interesting in seeing what other people are doing with RoR. Thanks.
    Apple Mac HQ - Apple/Mac News, Reviews, and More

  2. #2
    The Mind's I ® silver trophy Dark Tranquility's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    KSA - UAE
    Posts
    9,458
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I use a textdrive.com shared hosting for testing RoR and it works fine

  3. #3
    ☆★☆★ silver trophy vgarcia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    in transition
    Posts
    21,236
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    You shouldn't have any problems on shared hosting with a 250 visitor per day site. Worry about VPS and dedicated servers later.

  4. #4
    The Mind's I ® silver trophy Dark Tranquility's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    KSA - UAE
    Posts
    9,458
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by vgarcia
    You shouldn't have any problems on shared hosting with a 250 visitor per day site. Worry about VPS and dedicated servers later.
    sure I believe that even Dreamhost shared plans are getting better for RoR and especially faster

  5. #5
    SitePoint Wizard silver trophy redemption's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    5,269
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I went the VPS route after trying to run a Typo blog on Dreamhost. It was just too slow and inconsistent.

    My VPS setup's Apache 2.2 + mod_proxy_balancer + mongrel_cluster at the moment, seems to be running fine and smoothly after some initial teething pains with deployment on a memory-starved VPS.

  6. #6
    SitePoint Guru silver trophy Luke Redpath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    794
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Tranquility
    I use a textdrive.com shared hosting for testing RoR and it works fine
    On the other hand, I've used textdrive and they weren't very good. My server was going down almost weekly it seemed.

    You may want to consider Railsmachine - a bit pricier than shared hosting but you get what you pay for - I've read lots of good reports and it has some cool rake tasks for getting things up and running.

  7. #7
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    anyone use Westhost.com VPS?

    I've looked at hosting from a myriad of solutions. I know you get what you pay for, but we also are bootstrapping this web application. So, we want something to scale as needed with our hopeful growth.

    Any suggestions on VPS hosting? Anyone use Westhost.com?

  8. #8
    SitePoint Zealot
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    124
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For VPS, I would recommend KnownHost. If you want a VPS aimed towards Ruby on Rails Rails Machine is the way to go (Amazing set up, and Zed Shaw, the author of Mongrel, helps run them.).

  9. #9
    SitePoint Zealot
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    173
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I actually just bought a cheap package from http://www.collarhosting.com which offers ruby on rails hosting, so its just as simple as uploading the files on the server, but the files go in the cgi bin I think instead of public_html

  10. #10
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i'm also a user of railsmachine.com
    i got the basic vps account. their online tech support has been fantastic.

  11. #11
    SitePoint Member killsaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    rather than going for a VPS, you can always get a shared hosting with ROR and high space and bandwidth.

    I use site5.com best service
    My Web 2.0 Apps: Wropl - Books

  12. #12
    ☆★☆★ silver trophy vgarcia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    in transition
    Posts
    21,236
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by killsaby
    rather than going for a VPS, you can always get a shared hosting with ROR and high space and bandwidth.

    I use site5.com best service
    I use site5 too, and for a site used by 250 visitors (like the first post says) you'd have a lot of spare space/bandwidth to use for other things if you wanted.

  13. #13
    Where's my title at? dreaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    144
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Can anyone tell me if Mongrel + mod_proxy has many advantages over apache (1.3) + mod_fastcgi?

  14. #14
    SitePoint Zealot
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    124
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you've got problems with FastCGI, yes. Mongrel is quite a bit easier to get working (Just install a gem and start the server Webrick style.), but FastCGI is slightly faster (There are benchmarks on the TextDrive blog, not by much though.).

  15. #15
    SitePoint Zealot HenriIV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Did someone test Planet Argon rails shared hosting service? It's cheap ($15 a month) but have never seen any comment about it.

  16. #16
    ☆★☆★ silver trophy vgarcia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    in transition
    Posts
    21,236
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dreaz
    Can anyone tell me if Mongrel + mod_proxy has many advantages over apache (1.3) + mod_fastcgi?
    It would crash a whole lot less, if my past experience is correct.

    What version of Apache would you be using?

  17. #17
    Where's my title at? dreaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    144
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by vgarcia
    It would crash a whole lot less, if my past experience is correct.

    What version of Apache would you be using?
    1.3 as I mentioned. I can use lighttpd or mongrel too, but apache is the easiest way for me.

  18. #18
    The Mind's I ® silver trophy Dark Tranquility's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    KSA - UAE
    Posts
    9,458
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Luke Redpath
    On the other hand, I've used textdrive and they weren't very good. My server was going down almost weekly it seemed.

    You may want to consider Railsmachine - a bit pricier than shared hosting but you get what you pay for - I've read lots of good reports and it has some cool rake tasks for getting things up and running.
    Well I've never had a problem with TD since 4 months when I first started using them. I found them simply on the RoR .org site where they were described as the official Ruby on Rails host !! so I didn't look further especially that their price was quite good

    I must say I am not hosting any functional sites there so I am not checking the uptime etc...

  19. #19
    ☆★☆★ silver trophy vgarcia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    in transition
    Posts
    21,236
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dreaz
    1.3 as I mentioned. I can use lighttpd or mongrel too, but apache is the easiest way for me.
    Consider Apache 2.2, which has much better mod_proxy/mod_proxy_balancer support with Mongrel.

  20. #20
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey, kfordham281 we will be launching free web hosting that supports ruby on rails in a couple of days if your interested.

  21. #21
    SitePoint Wizard silver trophy redemption's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    5,269
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by vgarcia
    Consider Apache 2.2, which has much better mod_proxy/mod_proxy_balancer support with Mongrel.
    Actually, mod_proxy for lighttpd is going to be much improved soon, in the next release (see http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/20...mod_proxy_core). That said, I run both Apache 2.2 + mod_proxy_balancer and lighttpd + mod_proxy + pound on separate sites, and both with Mongrel backends, and both approaches are workable.

    The main beef people have with in lighttpd is mod_proxy, but you can easily do away with that by putting a 3rd-party load-balancer like pound or pen in front of your mongrel cluster. At least, until mod_proxy is "fixed"

    That said, I still recommend going to Apache route especially if you are more familiar with managing and configuring Apache (as most webmasters would be).

  22. #22
    The Mind's I ® silver trophy Dark Tranquility's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    KSA - UAE
    Posts
    9,458
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by redemption
    Actually, mod_proxy for lighttpd is going to be much improved soon, in the next release (see http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/20...mod_proxy_core).
    Interesting to know this! it seems that using FastCGI is going to be nicer

  23. #23
    ☆★☆★ silver trophy vgarcia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    in transition
    Posts
    21,236
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Tranquility
    Interesting to know this! it seems that using FastCGI is going to be nicer
    You wouldn't need FastCGI if you're proxying direct to Mongrel for any Rails action.

  24. #24
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm also looking for ror hosting. Found this one
    http://hubpages.com/hub/Bluehost

    but I didn't try it yet. Does someone did ?

    Thanks.

  25. #25
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Old thread, but as its been brought alive recently I thought I'd add what we do. We run our own 4 server Rails Cluster with lighttpd, mongrels and mysql - works very nicely - but then again, most things you setup and manage yourself run as you would expect.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •