phpMyAdmin 2.2.0

**Defender1** · Oct 23, 2001 02:18

What do you guys think of the newest version?
here's the version changes:

security fixes
new languages: thai, swedish, ...
removed necessity of magic_quotes_gpc (autodetection)
dynamic multiple language support, with automatic browser language detection
gzip and HTTP compression support
user and db administration page
improved documentation
bookmarks (sql queries) feature
better file import/export possibilities
database usage statistics
javascript and html/css compatibility improvements
table maintenance features (repair, check, optimize)
maintained PHP3 compatibility
better BLOB support
table usage and row statistics
multiple table types
now backed by a full-time development team!

**TheOriginalH** · Oct 23, 2001 04:00

2.1.0 here - pukka bit of kit. May upgrade though.....
Have you tried 2.2.1rc2 yet?

**Amit** · Oct 23, 2001 05:07

Yeah its really cool man ...

I especially like the Database space and usage stats and info ...

**rwar** · Oct 23, 2001 05:19

Originally posted by Defender1
What do you guys think of the newest version?

maintained PHP3 compatibility

The day won't have support to an older version (for a while), a lot of people won't upgrade their systems (phpmyadmin for example).

phpmyadmin is the best BD manager i ever saw. Even an older version (2.2.1rc1).

**seanf** · Oct 23, 2001 12:41

I voted awesome because that is exactly what I think!

Sean

**freddydoesphp** · Oct 23, 2001 14:51

commandline, commandline, commandline, not wysiwyg version of db managers, please!!!!!!!!!!

I think you need another choice in your poll, that reads "I don't need the aid of a program like"

**Defender1** · Oct 23, 2001 15:44

you can use any sql you want in phpMyAdmin
theres a section for it. but not everyone has access to telnet/commandline, like myself, so i have no choice but phpMyAdmin. (in fact my host has it installed and keeps the versions up to date.)

**freddydoesphp** · Oct 23, 2001 15:49

"A host using unix servers without telnet/ssh access is no host at all"

-freddydoesphp Tues October 23, 2001

**Defender1** · Oct 23, 2001 15:53

When it's free you take what you can get

(my friend is paying for the service, so i won't complain

)

**freddydoesphp** · Oct 23, 2001 15:59

"You get what you pay for"

-freddydoesphp's mom Sunday May 10, 1981

**rwar** · Oct 23, 2001 18:17

Originally posted by freddydoesphp
"A host using unix servers without telnet/ssh access is no host at all"

Who does not have how to have a unix server? hein??? Do you know some people don't have a conscience on how it's better to work? Like my **** boss? He wants because he wants a rwindows server and end point (his money, his company and so on).

I have my own server at home - just to play with it (of course it's a unix).

Any idea on how to take with this situation?