SitePoint Sponsor |
|
User Tag List
Results 1 to 25 of 28
Thread: RoR 1.1 hits primetime
-
Mar 28, 2006, 21:36 #1
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- RI-USA
- Posts
- 5,620
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
RoR 1.1 hits primetime
This was already blogged about earlier today on SP's new Ruby on Rails blog... but I figured it needed some forum love.
The biggest upgrade in Rails history has finally arrived. Rails 1.1 boasts more than 500 fixes, tweaks, and features from more than 100 contributors. Most of the updates just make everyday life a little smoother, a little rounder, and a little more joyful.
(Check out SP's recent RoR article, too.)
-
Mar 28, 2006, 22:19 #2
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 440
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Yes I was very excited to go to the ruby on rails weblog and find 1.1 released only 3 minutes before I visited!
(Got the first comment on it too
hehe)
It's a great release with a BUNCH of great new features, I've been playing around with a few and I'm loving it.
-
Mar 29, 2006, 00:22 #3
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 72
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Great news, already updated over here. Can't wait to fully test the new enhancements, they looks quite promising!
Eric A.
Founder and CEO, XMG Networks, Inc.
XMG Services: Web 2.0 Photo Management and Sharing | Web Hosting
Personal Blog: From Two 2 Twelve
-
Mar 29, 2006, 04:54 #4
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Switzerland
- Posts
- 597
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Yeah Ruby is getting more and more interesting. I still stick with PHP, but I am definitly working on getting closely familiar with Ruby
.
-
Mar 29, 2006, 05:56 #5Code:
gem update rails
-
Mar 29, 2006, 06:51 #6
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Posts
- 8
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
The proper upgrade technique is the following in a Terminal application:
Code:gem install rails --include-dependencies
-
Mar 29, 2006, 14:23 #7
Argh. I don't think the login engine has been updated to support 1.1 yet. I can't seem to get WEBrick to start up an app I wrote that uses it
Edit:
I seem to be getting a "stack level too deep" error, both when I start WEBrick and when I try to run Rake.
-
Mar 29, 2006, 16:44 #8
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- KSA - UAE
- Posts
- 9,457
- Mentioned
- 8 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 1 Thread(s)
Well good news, I like the RJS new template system !! (will we say goodbye to Javascript headaches?) Integration Testing is nice too
-
Mar 29, 2006, 17:49 #9
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- Bristol, England
- Posts
- 332
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Unfortunately, it appears that Rails 1.1 breaks Typo (and maybe a few other Rails apps too). If your host has switched to 1.1 and broken Typo, there's advice on how to fix it here:
http://nubyonrails.com/articles/2006...ver-monitoring
-
Mar 29, 2006, 17:58 #10
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 258
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
I used
gem install rails —include-dependencies
and got the following output:
Code:Attempting local installation of 'rails' Local gem file not found: rails*.gem Attempting remote installation of 'rails' Updating Gem source index for: http://gems.rubyforge.org Successfully installed rails-1.1.0 Successfully installed rake-0.7.0 Successfully installed activesupport-1.3.0 Successfully installed activerecord-1.14.0 Successfully installed actionpack-1.12.0 Successfully installed actionmailer-1.2.0 Successfully installed actionwebservice-1.1.0 Installing RDoc documentation for rake-0.7.0... Installing RDoc documentation for activesupport-1.3.0... Installing RDoc documentation for activerecord-1.14.0... Installing RDoc documentation for actionpack-1.12.0... Installing RDoc documentation for actionmailer-1.2.0... Installing RDoc documentation for actionwebservice-1.1.0...
"Application error
Rails application failed to start properly""
I don't even know where to start figuring out where this went wrong, since I didn't do anything except run 1 command.
-
Mar 29, 2006, 18:55 #11
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 440
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Look in the logs to see, and remove all plugins.
-
Mar 29, 2006, 19:10 #12
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 258
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
No plugins... here is the server.log:
Code:/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.3.0/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:112:in `const_missing': uninitialized constant LoadingModule (NameError) from /path/to/project/public/../config/environment.rb:66 from /path/to/project/public/dispatch.cgi:3 [Wed Mar 29 19:32:39 2006] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Premature end of script headers: /path/to/project/public/dispatch.cgi
-
Mar 29, 2006, 20:27 #13
Originally Posted by vgarcia
http://dev.rails-engines.org/tickets/104
-
Mar 29, 2006, 20:34 #14
Originally Posted by Simon Mackie
For people having problems with their apps, may I suggest freezing your apps to Rails 1.0 by either unpacking the 1.0 gem or checking out 1.0 from the Rails repository into vendor/rails - you can then be sure that when/if your host upgrades you wont have any problems and you can investigate upgrading locally in your own time.
-
Mar 29, 2006, 20:52 #15
Originally Posted by Luke Redpath
-
Mar 29, 2006, 21:12 #16
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 440
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by JNKlein
-
Mar 30, 2006, 11:34 #17
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- New Orleans LA (504) 812-8971
- Posts
- 541
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
What does rails have over the next platform?
Is it google friendly?Logo Design & Identity Branding Consultant.
-
Mar 31, 2006, 05:22 #18
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Worcs. UK
- Posts
- 404
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
There's also the command:
Code:rake rails:update
Upgrade worked fine for me! Engaging smug mode.
-
Mar 31, 2006, 08:18 #19
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- Oklahoma
- Posts
- 119
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by Luke Redpath
-
Mar 31, 2006, 09:41 #20
Originally Posted by vgarcia
-
Mar 31, 2006, 12:04 #21
- Join Date
- Jul 2000
- Location
- Warwickshire, England
- Posts
- 557
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
yay for rails
-
Mar 31, 2006, 13:03 #22
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Albany, NY
- Posts
- 417
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Ok..I updated 1.1 on my personal server (only me using Rails on that). Broke almost everything. So I backed it out..everything started working. Sticking with 1.0.0 for now..don't have time to muck with it.
As for our production servers, unless we get cients begging for it, we're maintaining Ruby 1.8.4 and Rails 1.0.0 as the official production releases.
Once 1.1.0 has stabalized, we'll revisit it.Sean P Sullivan
Web Hosting::Web Templates::Free Smilies
Free Image Hosting::DIY Home Repair::DIY Gardening::Flash Games
-
Mar 31, 2006, 13:19 #23
Originally Posted by CapitalWebHost
-
Mar 31, 2006, 16:00 #24
Originally Posted by Thyrium
-
Apr 11, 2006, 14:19 #25
http://www.theserverside.com/news/th...d=32723#162562
interesting debate
Bookmarks