Hi everybody, I wondered if anybody had any opinions on the following issue that I have.
We have been developing a internet based business application for a client, basically a online booking system with CRM and mobile communications functionality. When we originally signed the contract to do the work we used our usual agreement that gave our client a sole license to use the system but no access to the back end code.
They have now come back to us and asked to buy the whole system from us, code, graphics, database, everything. We are not against selling but we want to get the true value of the system.
When we originally quoted we based our price on the length of time we thought it would take to develop the system, which has been broadly accurate. We did however keep the original quoted price low because we knew that our client would be tied to us and would have to come back to us for updates/maintenance etc. From what they have now said they will probably not be signing any form of future maintenance agreement with us.
The system uses a lot of code that we have developed as a business in previous projects, obviously we give our client all the code for the application they will have access to all of this.
Anyway my question is this, how much do you look to increase your prices when the client wishes to buy all the intellectual property rights to the project - our initial thoughts were to double the original quote. What do others think? Is there an accepted formula?
Thanks in advance for any help.
David





Bookmarks