| SitePoint Sponsor |
|
|
User Tag List
Results 26 to 30 of 30
-
Dec 15, 2005, 09:45 #26SitePoint Wizard
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Posts
- 5,011
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
In the same way you can use any text editor as an an editor for Ruby, yes.
Originally Posted by MiltonBC
There are some details about adding Ruby sytax highlighting to Dreamweaver, but it seems from the comments on that page those instruction may not work with DW2004.Using your unpaid time to add free content to SitePoint Pty Ltd's portfolio?
-
May 29, 2006, 14:33 #27Wadge!
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- South Wales, UK
- Posts
- 1,134
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by samsm
OMFG SitePoint ROXORZ TEH BIG ONE111!
Wish you were invisible?
-
Jan 22, 2008, 17:35 #28SitePoint Addict
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Uk, London
- Posts
- 228
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
that's more like it, i love it and thanks for that sitepoint.....
-
Nov 10, 2008, 13:15 #29SitePoint Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Simply Rails 2 (and all of the other rails books I have) shows the migration file naming convention is
001, 002, etc
When I ran script/generate model User, the migration file was named:
20081110174511_create_users.rb
Why does it have this complex number instead of 001? Is there a way to
redo this and get the simpler name?
-
Apr 7, 2009, 20:48 #30Programming Team
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- West Springfield, Massachusetts
- Posts
- 17,036
- Mentioned
- 187 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
It's really not complex once you recognize what it is. You could manually change the file names if you wanted to I suppose. But YYYYMMDDHHMMSS isn't all that bad is it?
Bookmarks