Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: The Moral Conflict of DHTML/CSS
Apr 5, 2001, 09:35 #1
- Join Date
- Jul 1999
- 0 Post(s)
- 0 Thread(s)
I'm working on a site right now that is using a dhtml drop down menu. My only problem is that this particular menu only works properly on IE5+. As any good site designer knows, this is a problem. Regardless of the Netscape issue, there are still many people using IE4.
I want the ability to offer my site to as many people as possible, but for the sake of navigation - I need to keep this dhtml menu.
Why do I call this a moral conflict? I haven't done much design work in several months (working on my MCSE) and when I was designing oh so long ago, I was a huge advocate of usability and cross-browser support. I'd like to keep this wonderful dhtml menu (it vastly improves navigation and usability for this particular site), but I want to provide my other visitors with a site of equal quality to the dhtml version.
What's the de facto standard (in webdesign, this seems to be an oxymoron) for situations like this? All of my other code is HTML 4.0 Transitional compliant, it's just this pesky drop down menu that ruins the site for visitors using anything other than IE5+.
I'd really appreciate any input the Sitepoint community has to offer.
Thanks in advance,