How?
I see oodles of guides and prefabbed layouts for the more common center-fluid/sides-fixed version of the 3-column layout, but can't find one for the combination I need.
Thanks in advance for any ideas/help/comments/pointers/css/urls/…
![]()
| SitePoint Sponsor |
How?
I see oodles of guides and prefabbed layouts for the more common center-fluid/sides-fixed version of the 3-column layout, but can't find one for the combination I need.
Thanks in advance for any ideas/help/comments/pointers/css/urls/…
![]()
New Plastic Arts: Visual Communication | DesignateOnline
Mate went to NY and all he got me was this lousy signature


Hi Bill,
I did this some time ago as an exercise but I haven't re-visited it lately so I hope its of some use.
http://www.pmob.co.uk/temp/3colfluidsides1.htm
I'm not sure how it will stand up in real use but your welcome to use it. I haven't seen anyone else do this either(in css)
Paul
I was hoping there might be a simpelr, claener way of doing it.
Your method seems to work in Safari, but MSIE5 barfs on it. and I don't have the energy left to find a tweak to satisfy MSIE/Mac.
The actual application is for this visual effect.
I was hoping to find a non-stacking solution, which is where this specific layout request came from.
As you can see, the left column ("rectoverso") is only used to visually support the central, horizontally-centered main container 'page'.
In the end it was simpler to lay down a 50% wide div tucked into the left and using it to hold a tiling background.
I then horizontally centered the main container div using the dead center/negative margin method ( *spit* *spit* ).
I'd hoped to avoid using position: absolute; on the container div, but had to for the sake of z-indexing (FF/Moz not being a big fan of negative z-index values)
As mentioned, I'd hoped that there would be a more regular solution, as I wanted to avoid using a stacking solution and I've never been a big fan of the negative margin kludge, but it seems to produce the most consistent results as well as being the lightest in terms of the amount of markup/css.
Perhaps I should stop writing off absolute, stacking solutions.
Thx all the same for the attempt, Paul.
New Plastic Arts: Visual Communication | DesignateOnline
Mate went to NY and all he got me was this lousy signature


Hi Bill,
What you have seems to work quite well and is pretty compact so its probably not worth messing with it
The only drawback I can see is that using the dead centre/negative margin technique is that the layout slides all the way off the left side as the screen is resized smaller. You could avoid that by using the margin-left:auto and margin-right:auto centering and then the container, header and footer could all be statically positioned (with position:relative for stacking order etc.)
But I'm well aware that you may have already tried that method (and many others) anyway, so I'm probably wasting your time
Paul
Nono…Originally Posted by Paul O'B
I could have sworn that I'd tried that, but clearly not as it does solve all the problems.
God knows what I was doing wrong/differently.
My head clearly wasn't on straight yesterday, so thanks for the 'coffee call'.![]()
New Plastic Arts: Visual Communication | DesignateOnline
Mate went to NY and all he got me was this lousy signature
Bookmarks