SitePoint Sponsor

User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 30 of 30
  1. #26
    Rabble Rouser bronze trophy
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Mountain View, CA
    Posts
    427
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's so much more complicated than this little toy system needs to be. I really hope you're joking.

  2. #27
    Wanna-be Apple nut silver trophy M. Johansson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Halmstad, Sweden
    Posts
    7,400
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with Paul. It's just points. You shouldn't have have been a member for 6 months to understand the system. I've read slashdot for 3 years now, and I still don't understand their crazy meta-karma and how you randomly get karma points.
    Mattias Johansson
    Short, Swedish, Web Developer

    Buttons and Dog Tags with your custom design:
    FatStatement.com

  3. #28
    SitePoint Wizard samsm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Atlanta, GA, USA
    Posts
    5,011
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul_C
    I really hope you're joking.
    I really hope you're not seriously hoping if I'm joking or not.
    Using your unpaid time to add free content to SitePoint Pty Ltd's portfolio?

  4. #29
    Rabble Rouser bronze trophy
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Mountain View, CA
    Posts
    427
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by samsm
    I really hope you're not seriously hoping if I'm joking or not.
    I really hope you're not seriously hoping I'm not truly hoping if you're joking or not.

  5. #30
    100% Windoze-free earther's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    2,788
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by samsm
    I think we should be able to give reputation to reputation. If someone posts a comment on the reputation they give, the recipient should be able to rate that comment with reputation themselves.

    That way if someone was hit with negative reputation but felt like they deserved it, they could actually strengthen its influence by giving the negative reputation some positive reputation. If the person who originally gave the negative reputation thought that they had been too hard on the first person initially, they could then give negative reputation to the positive reputation of the negative reputation.
    Read this late last night and it made my head swim. Still does. Seems about the same as trying to find the value of Pi to the last decimal.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •