Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread: Background image size
Jun 8, 2003, 22:36 #1
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Springfield, Missouri
- 0 Post(s)
- 0 Thread(s)
Background image size
Is it better to have a small image that tiles many times but is a small file size or a larger image that does not tile as many times but is a larger file size?
What is the ideal size for fast loading?
On one of my old sites I have images that are 1280 wide but only about 150 tall so they only tile down and not across. On another site I have one that is about 150 X 150 so it tiles over and over both ways but is tiny in file size.
Usually I try to avoid them altogether but one of my sites has people complaining that it's dull and needs more graphics to liven it up.
Jun 9, 2003, 02:56 #2
Try and find other ways to liven it up, adding a huge background image wont beat a nicely done header.
But if you have no choice, use the smaller one.