SitePoint Sponsor

User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Website offline for years, ok to use content?

    I am looking at using content from an old website that has been offline for sometime. I am wondering if this is legal? Does the defunct website own the content forever or is reusing ok?

  2. #2
    Barefoot on the Moon! silver trophy
    Force Flow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Northeastern USA
    Posts
    4,516
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Whomever created it, owns it.

    See if you can contact the author and ask permission to republish it.
    Visit The Blog | Follow On Twitter
    301tool 1.1.5 - URL redirector & shortener (PHP/MySQL)
    Can be hosted on and utilize your own domain

  3. #3
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    midwestern USA
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you re-word or manipulate the content well enough it should be legal. but that takes some work (not for the lazy) .

  4. #4
    SitePoint Mentor silver trophybronze trophy
    Mikl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    1,440
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 55408 View Post
    If you re-word or manipulate the content well enough it should be legal. but that takes some work (not for the lazy) .
    It might or might not be legal, but it's disreputable, and probably won't be of any real benefit to you.

    If you can't create your own content, you should either pay someone to do it, or make an arrangement with the defunct site to re-publish theirs. Just re-wording someone else's content is pretty worthless. And re-publishing without permission is definitely an infringement of copyright.

    The fact that the site is defunct makes no difference. After all, think how many famous authors have been dead for several years. You wouldn't expect to re-publish their books without permission. A website is not that much different.

    Mike

  5. #5
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    midwestern USA
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikl View Post


    It might or might not be legal, but it's disreputable, and probably won't be of any real benefit to you.

    If you can't create your own content, you should either pay someone to do it, or make an arrangement with the defunct site to re-publish theirs. Just re-wording someone else's content is pretty worthless. And re-publishing without permission is definitely an infringement of copyright.

    The fact that the site is defunct makes no difference. After all, think how many famous authors have been dead for several years. You wouldn't expect to re-publish their books without permission. A website is not that much different.

    Mike
    Re-wording it does make a big difference, not just with copyright. Its worthwhile if you understand it, did fact checking, and gathered info from numerous sources.

    So I'd only agree with you if the article you wrote was all from one original article. Most information, per se, isn't original. Its inevitable for things to get repeated and re-shared. its not bad when the info itself is good, and its written well each time in a unique way.

  6. #6
    SitePoint Mentor silver trophybronze trophy
    Mikl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    1,440
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just out of curiosity, Phpnuke23, how do you know about the website in question? You say it has been off-line for some time. But you presumably have access to the content, otherwsie you wouldn't be asking this question. That suggests that you are in contact with the site's former operators, which means that it should be easier to ask their permission.

    Alternatively, is it possible that the site isn't off-line at all? That it has simply moved to a new URL, for instance? Or that the operators have done a deal with another site to take over the content?

    As I said, I'm really only asking out of curiosity. It doesn't affect the copyright question.

    Mike

  7. #7
    Non-Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You can keep that offline site's information as a base and try out your own content from it. Using the same content surely does not sound good. Out of the box thinking is definitely needed for writing content that is attractive, unique and most importantly understandable.

  8. #8
    Barefoot on the Moon! silver trophy
    Force Flow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Northeastern USA
    Posts
    4,516
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lara Anjela View Post
    You can keep that offline site's information as a base and try out your own content from it. Using the same content surely does not sound good. Out of the box thinking is definitely needed for writing content that is attractive, unique and most importantly understandable.
    Again, this brushes up against possible copyright infringement.
    Visit The Blog | Follow On Twitter
    301tool 1.1.5 - URL redirector & shortener (PHP/MySQL)
    Can be hosted on and utilize your own domain

  9. #9
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't think so you should use the content of any other site whether it is online or offline. As you must be knowing about google panda update . Your site can be penalized if anything goes wrong. You should always go for fresh and original content

  10. #10
    SitePoint Mentor silver trophybronze trophy
    Mikl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    1,440
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by caleymartin View Post
    I don't think so you should use the content of any other site whether it is online or offline. As you must be knowing about google panda update . Your site can be penalized if anything goes wrong. You should always go for fresh and original content
    You're right that you should "always go for fresh and original content". But it's got nothing to do with Google or Panda. Google can't distinguish between legitimate copies and plagiarism (unless someone files a complaint). The reason you should not copy someone else's content is that doing so (without their permission) is an infringement of their copyright.

    The original question in this thread was whether it was OK to re-use content for a site that has been off-line for a long time. That question was answered in the first two or three replies.

    Mike



  11. #11
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If old website is not offline for long time and content is already indexed in google then copying content will be duplicate and site can be penalized.
    It's better re-wording old content to make it different. Google gives more value to new and fresh content.

  12. #12
    Barefoot on the Moon! silver trophy
    Force Flow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Northeastern USA
    Posts
    4,516
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sophina88 View Post
    If old website is not offline for long time and content is already indexed in google then copying content will be duplicate and site can be penalized.
    It's better re-wording old content to make it different. Google gives more value to new and fresh content.
    Reiterating Miki's response, this is *not* an SEO question. This is a question regarding republishing web content and copyright issues. As SEO is unrelated to this question, any additional responses pertaining to SEO will be fluffed.

    Further discussion on republishing content or on copyright are perfectly welcome.
    Visit The Blog | Follow On Twitter
    301tool 1.1.5 - URL redirector & shortener (PHP/MySQL)
    Can be hosted on and utilize your own domain

  13. #13
    SitePoint Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have you tried looking at the WhoIs logs and seeing if you could get an email address? You could probably republish the content if you get in contact and they say you're allowed to.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •