it is very difficult to write articles of good quality. Still, your articles must have themes concerned about your company ro products or other things concerned. I am trying to write one article everyday.
most people are using special tools to make pseudo original articles, because in this way they can make a lot of articles without being called copy and save a lot of time and attract plenty of traffic. What do you think of this way ? Is it really workable and effective ? Is this a black hat practice ?
To quote myself:Quote:
Originally Posted by lonking
As Mikl said, "most people" aren't doing this, only lazy and shady people.Quote:
Originally Posted by samanime
If you are making a "pseudo original" article, your originality is a fake by definition. You'll find the "plenty of traffic" you attract will easily become disenchanted with the rubbish a "pseudo original article" spills out and go find a source that shows real expertise in their topic. Bottom line, if you want a high traffic level with a high bounce rate and a bad rep on the web, use "pseudo original articles". Just be careful that the genuine original authors don't find them or you could be in legal trouble as well without a leg to stand on or a penny in your pocket.
Black hat? I guess I would say that anything that tries to game the search engines and/or fool my visitors is black hat. That's pretty much what a "pseudo originality" does.
In addition to everything that's been said here about copyright infringement and "black hat" methods, I would add this:
What do you hope to achieve with this sort of dubious practice? Why are you creating a website in the first place, if you rely on plagiarising other people's legitimate content? If you are not able to create your own original material, then you really need to find another way of achieving your goals.
Real inspiration comes from finding something that interests you enough to become well-grounded in the subject matter and form your own opinion. For instance, your post has inspired me to write these paragraphs.
content writting is an ideal way, but what if you have little information about what you are gonna write, there must be a subject, you have to write things related with it. Just take my experience for example, it is very headache to find something to write related with our company or products, not only my knowledge is limited, but also the company is very outdated in informatin. What's worse, most informatin were not wrote in English, you have to translate it by yourself. i almost had enough about the translation. Any better way to deal with this situation ?
You can come up with someone decent in the time it'll take you to edit someone's work.
And best of all, it'd be original
To further elaborate on what Shyflower, if you are so far removed from the content that you don't know where to start, perhaps you should look for someone else that is. Even if they aren't a content writer, you could use them as an information source and fact checker.
Our marketing department where I work often writes about things that they aren't very familiar with (like programming and web development). So, they come talk to us (the developers and web departments) and get information from us. They then write whatever it is they are writing, and send it back to us so we can provide a fact check and give them any suggestions. The results are great, and they didn't have to spin anyone else's content. =p
It is not stealing if you have permission from the author. There are PLR articles available online that you can rewrite but writing your own content is still the best thing to do or hire someone to do it for you.
According to Google Panda that's not different because if you change that using Synonyms. then whats the effect of your contain? so for better create your contain different and unique.
Article spinning will be a obstacle to rank your site. Also illegal too. Write article yourself or use somebody who can write article.
Most people don't have patience to read articles. You can easily write your content as short lists and phrases without need of a copyrighter.