Suppose if someone really want their site in IE then they search for someone who can do it. it’s another matter if person refuse to made it for Ie6 and just give IE7 or IE8 support.

IF someone say First “Hey, I don’t care about Ie so you can use anything that work in chrome and firefox”.

Basically, Chrome does not scale as your number of tabs increases. I have hundreds of tabs open in Firefox now, and it works great, because it scales! And it is exceedingly odd that Chrome does not scale, coming from a company whose core advantages have been scalability and algorithms, but that doesn’t stop it being true. The people who say “but why do you need that many tabs?” are the same ones who presumably said “why do you need that many servers?”; people either understand scalablility, or they say “but why do you need that?” when they simply don’t get it.

I switched from FF to chrome about two years ago and have never fired up FF again since.

At some point, however, Apple could come up against regulators. The only reason Apple can provide their own browser at the expense of all others is because they have a relatively small share. But the success of iPads could result in Safari having an unfair advantage in the tablet market. Microsoft are already being investigated for less-stringent restrictions in Windows RT – and their devices have a fraction of Apple’s sales.