Color Correction is one of those things you don’t get a lot of practice on as a web designer, so I thought we might look the quick and mostly foolproof method I prefer to use.
Let’s start with a question. What is this? (see blue chip to the right). If you said, "it’s a particularly pleasant shade of blue," you’d be at least partially right.
However, you’d be only be 100% correct if you said, "a zoomed up section of Cameron Adams’ cheek," for, as you can see the photo below, the man in blue was the man of blue the day this particular picture was taken.
Now, this is a great photo, but it presented problems when I came to use it as his author shot on a book cover. While the blue tint looks pretty cool in isolation, it comes off a bit odd when placed alongside a handful of normal, pinky-yellow toned author shots. I needed to moderate the blue tint (or more correctly "cast"), but as the chip above shows, there was a lot of it!
Last year, you might remember we looked at using Photoshop’s Lab color mode to give any photo a visual shot in the arm.
Today we’ll look at LAB’s ability to make quite dramatic but highly targeted corrections to problem colors without destroying the overall color balance.
1). First, we need to change the photo from its default RGB to the LAB color space (Image/Mode/Lab Color). Feel free to save the image above and follow along in Photoshop.
2). As I explained in my first piece on Lab color, in the Lab universe, everything is explained in terms of three channels:
- L – Lightness vs Darkness
- A – Redness vs Greenness
- B – Blueness vs Yellowness (I remember ‘B’ for blue)
If any of those colors start to dominate an image, the quickest way to restore the color balance is to boost its opposite color.
As you can see by the screenshot at the right, the B channel is showing almost all its tone bunched up on the blue (left-hand) side of the chart. Rebalancing this channel will go a long way towards fixing this image.
3). With your image selected, bring up the Curves dialog (Image/Adjustments/Curves) and switch to the B channel.

4). Next, grab the top right (or yellow) corner of the graph and drag it slowly to the left, watching the blue cast start to rinse away as you do.
As you can see in the example at left, while the skintones begin to clear immediately, the true blues and reds are only marginally affected by the change.
5). Okay, the skintone is better, but moderating the blue has brought out a slight greeny tinge. We can tackle that by switching to the A channel and boosting the red just a tiny bit.

You’ll need to be a little sensitive with this channel as the blue wall behind Cameron has quite a bit of red in it, so adding too much red will start to turn the background towards purple.

6). Lastly, we’ll make a final adjustment to clean up the L channel.
Take each end of the line and slide it slowly horizontally back towards the centerline of the graph.
There’s no mathematically correct formula for placing your points, but:
- Your shadows should look richer without getting too "blocky," or filling in.
- Your highlights should look brighter without showing a visible edge or step between the lightest tone and the second-lightest tone.
When you’re happy with the result, click OK and feel free to switch your color mode back to your normal color mode (presumably RGB or CMYK).
I’ll leave you with an overlay of the original image on our finished product. Not a bad result for a two-step process (i.e. change color mode, adjust curves).








Nice, short and helpfull article!
February 20th, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Alternatively: just make a levels adjustment layer and set the grey point. Done (and looks better, IMO.)
February 20th, 2008 at 8:30 pm
I normally just use the auto-level feature… quick and easy.
It didn’t quite get the same results though for this photo, but a dramatic improvement most of the time.
February 20th, 2008 at 11:48 pm
Well, I’m not a fan of auto-level (destructive editing, automatically ) but in this example I got a better result from one click with the grey eyedropper on an adjustment layer.
(Is cfz a spammer, or what? The comment *seemed* to make sense, but then it’s prefixed with a gambling link!)
February 21st, 2008 at 7:54 am
Nice orange band.. SXSW?
February 21st, 2008 at 8:55 am
Gavalian Web Design Studio, Glendale, California
March 5th, 2008 at 6:30 pm
Thanks for the information!
I recommend checking out some of the Photoshop skills of our graphic designer, artist, Madalina Iordache-Levay: http://www.ardis-creative.com/blog
March 11th, 2008 at 4:02 am
Thanks for sharing this with us… nice work.
March 11th, 2008 at 9:48 pm
how do i get the histogram to show up on the curves graph?
January 27th, 2009 at 5:08 am