Particularly if you installed the beta, but also for vastly improved performance, you’ll want to grab the final version of Flash Player 8 as soon as possible.
SitePoint Marketplace
Buy and sell Websites, templates, domain names, hosting, graphics and more.
Download sample chapters of any of our popular books.
Learn more with SitePoint books





September 13th, 2005 at 2:19 am
I tried the beta, but all the content @ sites like cnet.com, and the macromedia site would not show. I don’t get any type of warning or errors. Just empty areas where the flash content should be. Looks like I’ll be using 7 until I figure out whats going on
September 13th, 2005 at 2:22 am
oh thats in FireFox 1.06, BTW
September 13th, 2005 at 7:13 am
Hopefully they are going to release a 64-bit version for Linux too. Because I’m still doing without Flash on a 64-bit Firefox, and I don’t like the precompiled 32-bit ones.
September 16th, 2005 at 2:47 am
aha, I figured it out, and I just to let ya know, it was the FireFox extentsion, Adblock, causing the problem. You have to disable obj-tab option under adblocks extension preferences.
heres a link to a the posts @ mozillazine that helped me fix it
hope that helps someone!
September 24th, 2005 at 5:20 pm
Where’s the link?
September 25th, 2005 at 9:32 pm
Fixed MystaMax’s comment so the link is visible.
October 17th, 2005 at 3:27 pm
There is an online petition running here:
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/lin64swf/
Sign it and send it along.
October 28th, 2005 at 8:32 pm
In my opinion, performance is still a bit slow if the Flash 8 swf uses too many filters and a lot of transparency, but it’s gotten better!
November 28th, 2005 at 10:04 pm
Thx to MystaMax with the FireFox help
July 7th, 2006 at 4:02 pm
every body said player 8 these days, if it’s really good, i will try!untill now, i still use quick flash player, seems ok!
http://www.yaodownload.com/video_t/videoplayer/quickflashplayer/
December 13th, 2006 at 1:18 am
But sometimes when I opened some flash embeded sites, it asks for flash player 9????